Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 5196

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/11/2014 APPROVING the plans and policies filed by defendant on 8/1/2014. Defendants shall forthwith, under the guidance of the Special Master, implement the plans and policies approved by this order. Implementation of the plans and policies shall be monitored by the Special Master in accordance with his monitoring and reporting duties in this action. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., 12 13 14 15 No. CIV. S-90-520 LKK/DAD (PC) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants. 16 17 On April 10, 2014 (ECF No. 5131), defendants were ordered to 18 work under the guidance of the Special Master to, inter alia, 19 revise their use of force policies and procedures and work with 20 the Special Master on a timeline for completion of their review 21 of the use of management status; to file a plan limiting or 22 eliminating altogether placement of class members removed from 23 the general population for non-disciplinary reasons in 24 administrative segregation units that house inmates removed from 25 the general population for disciplinary reasons, and a revised 26 policy concerning strip searches in Enhanced Outpatient Unit 27 Administrative Segregation Unit (EOP ASU) hubs. 28 also ordered to report to the court and the Special Master 1 Defendants were 1 monthly on whether each EOP ASU hub meets the requirements of the 2 Program Guide for EOP ASU level of care and prohibitions on 3 placement of Coleman class members in non-compliant EOP ASU hubs. 4 Id. at 72-74. 5 deadlines set in the order were extended to August 1, 2014. 6 Order filed May 13, 2014 (ECF No. 5150) at 2-3. 7 By order filed May 13, 2014, several relevant See On August 1, 2014, defendants filed a report on compliance 8 with the foregoing requirements of the April 10, 2014 order 9 together with the required plans and policies. In particular, 10 defendants have filed a revised use of force policy; a new 11 statewide management cell status policy; a plan to limit or 12 eliminate placement of class members removed from the general 13 population for non-disciplinary reasons in administrative 14 segregation units that house inmates removed from the general 15 population for disciplinary reasons; a plan to report on Program 16 Guide compliance for the EOP ASU hubs; and a revised strip search 17 policy. 18 The court has reviewed defendants’ report and the 19 accompanying plans and policies. 20 and the Special Master and his team for the substantial effort 21 that resulted in the materials tendered to the court. 22 agrees with defendants that they have made substantial changes to 23 the relevant policies and procedures, and that those changes meet 24 the requirements of the April 10, 2014 order.1 25 1 26 27 28 The court commends the parties The court Accordingly, the Defendants have included a request for modification of the April 10, 2014 order to the extent, if at all, that the court determines any of the plans and policies do not comply with the “terms and intent” of the April 10, 2014 order. Defs. Plans and Policies (ECF No. 5190) at 3. The April 10, 2014 order prohibits placement of “any class members removed from the general population for non-disciplinary reasons for more than seventy-two hours in administrative segregation units that house inmates removed from the general 2 1 plans and policies will be approved. 2 to implement the plans and policies forthwith consistent with the 3 representations in their report. 4 monitored by the Special Master in accordance with his monitoring 5 and reporting duties in this action. Defendants will be directed Said implementation shall be 6 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. 8 9 The plans and policies filed by defendant on August 1, 2014 are approved. 2. Defendants shall forthwith, under the guidance of the 10 Special Master, implement the plans and policies approved by this 11 order consistent with the representations in the report that 12 accompanies the plans and policies. 13 3. Implementation of the plans and policies approved by 14 this order shall be monitored by the Special Master in accordance 15 with his monitoring and reporting duties in this action. 16 DATED: August 11, 2014. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 population for disciplinary reasons.” Order filed April 10, 2014 (ECF No. 5131) at 73. The non-disciplinary segregation policy tendered to the court incorporates a maximum ten-day period for classification determinations concerning the applicability of non-disciplinary status, with Coleman class members’ classification process to be expedited, in addition to the seventytwo hour maximum stay ordered by the court. To the extent modification of the order is required for this plan, it is granted. No further modification of the April 10, 2014 order are required at this time. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?