Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 5438

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/02/16 ordering the parties request for a 60 days extension of the Court's 12/28/15 order modifying its 02/03/15 order allowing defendants to temporarily conduct Security/W elfare checks utilizing Guard One at the Pelican Bay SHU once per hour during First Watch (2200 hours to 0600) hours is granted. This stipulation will expire on 06/30/16 and may be continued by further Stipulation and concurrence of the Special Master. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JAY C. RUSSELL DANIELLE F. O'BANNON Supervising Deputy Attorneys General ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931 MANEESH SHARMA, State Bar No. 280084 CHRISTINE M. CICCOTTI, State Bar No. 238695 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 323-4025 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Christine.Ciccotti@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., 15 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING ORDER MODIFYING v. FEBRUARY 3, 2015 ORDER REGARDING FIRST WATCH SECURITY/WELFARE CHECKS AT EDMUND G. BROWN JR., et al., PELICAN BAY STATE PRISON SECURITY HOUSING UNIT Defendants. Judge Kimberly J. Mueller 16 17 18 19 2:90-cv-00520 KJM-KJN (PC) 20 21 The parties, with the concurrence of the Special Master, stipulate as follows: 22 On December 28, 2015, this Court approved the parties’ stipulation that Security/Welfare 23 checks utilizing Guard One at the Pelican Bay State Prison Security Housing Unit (SHU) 24 temporarily be conducted only once per hour during First Watch (2200 hours to 0600 hours), 25 while Defendants worked to assess and possibly reduce the noise caused by the opening and 26 closing of the Unit’s pod doors. Order, Dec. 28, 2015, ECF NO. 5393. That stipulation expires by its terms on May 1, 2016. Id. 27 28 /// 1 Stip. and Order Extending Order Modifying Security/Welfare Checks at Pelican Bay SHU (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-KJN (PC)) 1 The parties continue to discuss this issue and assess whether any additional reasonable steps 2 can be considered that may address Plaintiffs’ concerns regarding the pod door noise at the 3 Pelican Bay SHU. Defendants anticipate receiving a report from an acoustical consultant within 4 the next approximately two weeks, and Defendants will provide a copy of that report to Plaintiffs 5 and the Special Master promptly after receipt. No later than June 3, 2016, Defendants will 6 provide a written report to Plaintiffs and the Special Master addressing recommendations or any 7 further follow-up steps based on the report, if any. 8 9 Therefore, the parties seek a 60 day extension of the Court’s December 28, 2015 order modifying its February 3, 2015 Order allowing Defendants to temporarily conduct 10 Security/Welfare checks utilizing Guard One at the Pelican Bay SHU once per hour during First 11 Watch (2200 hours to 0600) hours. This stipulation will expire on June 30, 2016, and may be 12 continued by further Stipulation and concurrence of the Special Master. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 15 Dated: April 28, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 16 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California DANIELLE F. O'BANNON Supervising Deputy Attorney General 17 18 19 /s/ Christine M. Ciccotti CHRISTINE M. CICCOTTI Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 20 21 22 /s/ Steven Fama STEVEN FAMA Attorney for Plaintiffs 23 24 25 26 CF1997CS0003 12244197.doc 27 28 2 Stip. and Order Extending Order Modifying Security/Welfare Checks at Pelican Bay SHU (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-KJN (PC)) 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 2, 2016. 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stip. and Order Extending Order Modifying Security/Welfare Checks at Pelican Bay SHU (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-KJN (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?