Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
5573
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/7/2017 ADOPTING in FULL 5448 Special Master's Monitoring Report on the Mental Health Inpatient Care programs for Inmates of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, as are his second, third, and fourth recommendations, 5448 at 121-22. Under the guidance and supervision of the Special Master, and with input from the plaintiffs as appropriate, the DSH defendants shall develop a plan within 90 days for the creation of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process to be utilized in the DSH inpatient programs that treat Coleman class members. The DSH defendants shall develop within 90 days a plan for the creation of a consistent and uniform patient level system to be utilized across all of its inpatient programs that treat Coleman class members. Until further order of court, defendants shall meet and confer with the Special Master at least thirty days before making any changes, additions, or reductions in the number and/or use of any inpatient beds or mental health crisis beds. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P
ORDER
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
As required by court order, see ECF No. 5188, on May 25, 2016, the Special
17
18
Master filed a monitoring report on the inpatient mental health care programs for class members.
19
ECF No. 5448. Neither party has filed objections to the findings in the report or the
20
recommendations made by the Special Master.
Prior to and following the Special Master’s submission of this report, the court has
21
22
held three status conferences with the parties to address the ongoing problem of waitlists for
23
access to inpatient mental health care. See ECF Nos. 5340, 5343, 5498, 5512, 5519, 5552. As a
24
consequence, events have now overtaken some of the findings1 and this, in turn, affects the first
25
and third recommendations in the report. See ECF No. 5544 at 121. As the court informed the
26
1
27
28
For example, the proposal to shift the responsibility for prison-based inpatient mental health care
programs from the Department of State Hospitals (DSH) to the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), see, e.g., ECF No. 5448 at 14-16, 37-41, has been
included in the Governor’s budget for 2017-18. See ECF No. 5544.
1
1
parties at the hearing on January 23, 2017, the problem with waitlists for access to inpatient care
2
will be the subject of an order to show cause. Given the foregoing, the court will not adopt the
3
first recommendation in the Special Master’s report. The findings in the report will be adopted in
4
full as will the second, third, and fourth recommendations.
5
In addition, the court will make an additional order to clarify the reporting
6
obligations of the parties going forward. At the hearing on January 23, 2017, it became clear that
7
defendants did not inform the Special Master when twenty inpatient beds were closed at the
8
Salinas Valley Psychiatric Program (SVPP) in October 2016 due to flooding. ECF No. 5560 at
9
37-38. Nor did defendants inform the Special Master of their decision to begin treating acute
10
inpatients at Atascadero State Hospital (ASH) in 2016. ECF No. 5560 at 66-67. In addition, the
11
Special Master has informed the court that defendants did not notify him of the closure of thirty-
12
eight additional beds at SVPP in January 2017 or the decision to use isolation rooms at DSH-
13
Stockton (Stockton) until ten days before the January 23, 2017 hearing. Given the history of the
14
remedial phase of this action, the court expects that defendants would have provided timely notice
15
to the Special Master and the plaintiffs of the bed closures at SVPP, the decision to once again
16
treat acute care patients at ASH, and the use of isolation rooms at Stockton. The court previously
17
has issued at least one court order requiring advance notice and approval. See ECF No. 1800 at 6
18
(“Until further order of this court, defendants shall not close any intermediate inpatient bed or
19
mental health crisis bed on the basis of state licensing requirements without approval of the
20
special master.”). Given the significance of the recent changes, the court will, by this order,
21
direct defendants to meet and confer with the Special Master prior to implementation of any
22
further changes, additions, or reductions in the number and/or use of any inpatient beds or mental
23
health crisis beds.
24
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1.
The findings in the Special Master’s Monitoring Report on the Mental Health
26
Inpatient Care programs for Inmates of the California Department of
27
Corrections and Rehabilitation, ECF No. 5448, are adopted in full, as are his
28
second, third, and fourth recommendations, ECF No. 5448 at 121-22.
2
1
2. The DSH defendants shall continue to work on their staffing plan for their
2
inpatient programs that treat Coleman class members. The plan should be
3
developed in coordination with CDCR’s development of its own mental health
4
staffing plan, and within the context of the same meet-and-confer process with
5
the Coleman parties, under the guidance of the Special Master. Due to the
6
urgency of the long-standing mental health staffing issues, the DSH defendants
7
shall provide the Special Master with monthly updates on their implementation
8
of their staffing plan so it may be tracked and monitored by the Special Master.
9
3. Under the guidance and supervision of the Special Master, and with input from
10
the plaintiffs as appropriate, the DSH defendants shall develop a plan within 90
11
days for the creation of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process to be
12
utilized in the DSH inpatient programs that treat Coleman class members. The
13
DSH defendants shall utilize CDCR as its consultant in this endeavor, availing
14
themselves of the expertise and strategies developed by CDCR staff and the
15
progress achieved thus far by CDCR in its development its own CQI process.
16
4. The DSH defendants shall develop within 90 days a plan for the creation of a
17
consistent and uniform patient level system to be utilized across all of its
18
inpatient programs that treat Coleman class members. There shall be a system
19
for use across all acute care inpatient programs, and a system for use across all
20
intermediate inpatient care programs.
21
5. Until further order of court, defendants shall meet and confer with the Special
22
Master at least thirty days before making any changes, additions, or reductions
23
in the number and/or use of any inpatient beds or mental health crisis beds. If
24
an emergency situation precludes such meet and confer thirty days in advance,
25
defendants shall consult with the Special Master immediately upon learning of
26
the need to make any changes, additions or reductions in the number and/or
27
/////
28
/////
3
1
use of inpatient beds or mental health crisis beds. As used in this order,
2
consultation requires a conference in person or by telephone and not mere
3
written notice or communication.
4
DATED: March 7, 2017.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?