Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 6252

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/23/19 For relief from 9/13/19 Evidentiary hearing deadlines. The deadlines set forth in paragraphs 3 through 6 of this Court's 7/11/19 Order 6216 are hereby VACATED. The Court shall set new deadlines in its order rescheduling the evidentiary hearing previously set for 9/13/19. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10 RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

11
v.

12

Case No. 2:90-CV-00520-KJM-DB
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
RELIEF FROM SEPTEMBER 13, 2019
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
DEADLINES

13 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
Defendants.

14

Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller

15
16

On June 21, 2019, the parties jointly proposed steps they deemed necessary to

17 prepare for the evidentiary hearing scheduled for September 13, 2019. (ECF No. 6205).
18 On July 11, 2019, the Court approved the parties’ joint request and issued an order
19 scheduling deadlines in advance of the hearing. (ECF No. 6216.) The Court ordered the
20 parties to exchange a list of evidentiary exhibits by August 23, 2019, to exchange
21 demonstrative exhibits by August 30, 2019, and to file a joint list of exhibits by September
22 5, 2019. (Id. at 2.) At the parties’ request, the Court later extended the deadline for
23 submission of the parties’ stipulation and joint statement to July 22, 2019. (ECF No. 6219
24 at 2.)
25

In its August 14, 2019 Order, the Court indicated that it was “inclined to move the

26 evidentiary hearing to the week of October 15, 2019,” and hold a quarterly status
27 conference on September 13, 2019 instead of the evidentiary hearing. (ECF No. 6242 at
28
1
[3426591.1]

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO AUGUST 23, 2019 FOR PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENT TO STATUS REPORT RE MHCB FUNDING

1 13.) The Court requested that the parties present their views on its proposed schedule.
2 (Id.)
3

The parties met and conferred regarding the Court’s proposed schedule and do not

4 object to continuing any evidentiary hearing to the week of October 15, 2019. Nor do the
5 parties object to the Court conducting a regular quarterly status conference on September
6 13, 2019 in lieu of the evidentiary hearing.
7

Accordingly, the parties jointly request an order granting them relief from the

8 deadlines previously set in anticipation of a hearing on September 13, 2019. And the
9 parties ask that the Court set new deadlines, or order the parties to meet and confer and
10 stipulate to new pre-hearing deadlines, in any further order scheduling the evidentiary
11 hearing, if appropriate.
12

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

13 DATED: August 22, 2019

Respectfully submitted,

14

ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP

15

By: /s/ Cara E. Trapani
Cara E. Trapani

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DATED: August 22, 2019

XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
By: /s/ Robert W. Henkels
Robert W. Henkels
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
ORDER OF THE COURT

25
26

The deadlines set forth in paragraphs 3 through 6 of this Court’s July 11, 2019

27 Order (ECF No. 6216) are hereby VACATED. The Court shall set new deadlines in its
28 order rescheduling the evidentiary hearing previously set for September 13, 2019. The
2
[3426591.1]

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO AUGUST 23, 2019 FOR PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENT TO STATUS REPORT RE MHCB FUNDING

1 parties shall meet and confer and propose new pre-hearing deadlines in their next set of
2 filings related to the evidentiary hearing.
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AS CLARIFIED, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5 DATED: August 23, 2019.
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[3426591.1]

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO AUGUST 23, 2019 FOR PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENT TO STATUS REPORT RE MHCB FUNDING