Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 6455

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/4/2020 ORDERING that within 30 days from the date of this order, defendants shall deposit with the Clerk of the Court a 133rd interim payment of costs in the amount of $950,000.00 which amount shall be invested in the interest-bearing account previously opened for this action. (cc: Financial Department)(Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 On December 11, 1995, the court entered an order referring this matter to a special 16 17 master and directing that the special master’s fees and expenses be borne by the defendants as 18 part of the costs of this action. A significant amount of work remains to be done by the special 19 master and additional funds are required to pay his fees and expenses. 20 Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. Within thirty days from the date of this order, defendants shall deposit with the 22 Clerk of the Court a one hundred and thirty-third interim payment of costs in the amount of 23 $950,000.001 which amount shall be invested in the interest-bearing account previously opened 24 for this action; and 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 28 1 Over the past year, the Special Master’s workload and staff have both increased, resulting in higher monthly bills. The court has determined it is necessary to increase the amount of the periodic deposits necessary for payment of the Special Master’s fees and expenses in order to ensure timely payment. 1 1 2 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial 3 Department of this Court. 4 DATED: February 4, 2020. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?