Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 6580

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/06/2020. The parties shall file briefing by noon on 4/8/2020 addressing the court's concerns. Defendant shall provide the Special Master and Plaintiff with expedited discovery by 4/7/2020, 5:00 p.m. The parties shall file a joint report with the court no later than noon on 4/9/2020. (Andrews, P)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On Saturday, April 4, 2020, the Three Judge Court, convened in this action and in 18 Plata v. Newsom, Case No. 01-cv-1351 JST (N.D. Cal.), denied an emergency motion bought by 19 plaintiffs in both cases to modify the prison population reduction order previously issued by that 20 court, in response to the current coronavirus pandemic. ECF No. 6574. The Three Judge Court’s 21 order was without prejudice to the right of each plaintiff class to seek “relief in a procedurally 22 appropriate forum, including the individual Coleman and/or Plata courts.” ECF No. 6574 at 2. 23 In a concurring opinion as a member of that court, the undersigned noted that “expedited 24 proceedings” to “immediately exhaust the possibility of inmate transfers and relocations to secure 25 facilities to achieve constitutionally acceptable conditions for the Plaintiff classes” remained 26 available before the individual district courts. ECF No. 6574 at 15 (Mueller, Chief District Judge, 27 concurring). In this court, a third status on the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the 28 Coleman class is set for this Friday. See ECF No. 6571. 1 1 Since the Three Judge Court issued its order, four more inmates have tested 2 positive for COVID-19, for a total of seventeen. See id. at 2; see also Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & 3 Rehab., Population COVID-19 Tracking1(last visited Apr. 6, 2020). This number has more than 4 doubled since late last week. The Special Master has informed the court that at least one of the 5 persons infected is a Coleman class member. Moreover, a total of fifty-three correctional staff 6 have self-reported as positive for the virus. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., Population COVID-19 7 Tracking2 (last visited Apr. 6, 2020). Again the Special Master has informed this court that at 8 least one such staff member conducted a group session for Coleman class members in March 9 2020. 10 In light of the growing numbers of infected CDCR inmates and staff members, the 11 exigent circumstances of which this court is aware appear to require immediate steps to safeguard 12 the constitutional rights of the plaintiff class. At this point, this court has no indication that 13 defendants are taking the immediate steps called for at this time. So that the court may by the 14 time of the upcoming status conference make a reasoned assessment of the current circumstances 15 in light of the applicable law, the parties shall by 12 noon on April 8, 2020, file simultaneous 16 briefing, limited to ten pages each, addressing the following: 17 1. In light of the coronavirus pandemic, what are the constitutional minima 18 required for physical safety for Coleman class members? Is six feet of physical distancing 19 required by the Constitution? If not, why not and what is required? 20 2. Assuming some level of physical distancing is required by the Constitution, 21 what additional steps, if any, must be taken to ensure that defendants continue to deliver to 22 Coleman class members at a minimum the level of mental health care that has thus far been 23 achieved in the ongoing remedial process in this case, focused on achieving the delivery of 24 constitutionally adequate mental health care to the plaintiff class? 25 ///// 26 27 1 See https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/covid19/population-status-tracking/. 28 2 See https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/covid19/cdcr-cchcs-covid-19-status/. 2 1 Additionally, defendants shall provide the following information to the Special 2 Master and the plaintiffs immediately, and in any event not later than 5:00 p.m. on April 7, 2020, 3 in the form of expedited discovery, subject to existing protective orders: 4 1. The number of Coleman class members by institution and mental health level 5 of care (CCCMS, EOP, MHCB, and inpatient care); a description of the housing space for each 6 level of care at each institution (i.e., double cell, single cell, dormitory), with sufficient 7 information to allow calculation of the physical distancing currently possible for each set of class 8 members at each institution and level of care, along with information on the physical distancing 9 currently being achieved; and a list identifying by name and housing location all Coleman class 10 members with at least one COVID-19 risk factor. 11 2. Defendants’ specific plan to achieve by the end of this week a defined level of 12 physical distancing for any Coleman class member currently residing in housing space that does 13 not allow six feet of physical distancing between inmates, including but not limited to concrete 14 information on any plans to temporarily relocate such class members to off-site secure facilities. 15 The parties shall meet and confer by 5:00 p.m. on April 8, 2020 regarding the 16 information provided by defendants and file a joint report with the court no later than 12:00 noon 17 on April 9, 2020 concerning the adequacy of defendants’ plan to achieve greater physical 18 distancing for members of the plaintiff class. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 6, 2020. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?