Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 6789

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/25/2020 APPROVING Extension of the Implementation Period for the CDCR's Telepsychiatry Policy. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 6789 Filed 07/27/20 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California ADRIANO HRVATIN, State Bar No. 220909 Supervising Deputy Attorney General ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931 TYLER V. HEATH, State Bar No. 271478 KYLE A. LEWIS, State Bar No. 201041 LUCAS HENNES, State Bar No. 278361 Deputy Attorneys General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 510-3585 Fax: (415) 703-5843 E-mail: Kyle.Lewis@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants ROMAN M. SILBERFELD, State Bar No. 62783 GLENN A. DANAS, State Bar No. 270317 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 Telephone: (310) 552-0130 Fax: (310) 229-5800 E-mail: RSilberfeld@RobinsKaplan.com Special Counsel for Defendants 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., 15 16 v. 17 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 18 2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC) Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING EXTENSION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD FOR THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION’S TELEPSYCHIATRY POLICY Defendants. 19 20 On March 27, 2020, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation proposing a provisional 21 policy regarding the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR) use of 22 telepsychiatry to provide mental health services to its inmate-patients. (ECF No. 6539.) The 23 parties agreed that the provisional telepsychiatry policy would be implemented within 120 days of 24 the Court’s approval of the stipulation, or by July 25, 2020 (this Saturday). (Id. at 2.) During this 25 120-day period, the parties agreed that Defendants would complete the internal monitoring 26 process allowing Defendants to provide notice to Plaintiffs and the Special Master, as required by 27 the provisional policy. (Id.) The stipulation further provided that if Defendants believed that the 28 120-day period should be extended due to the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on CDCR, they [3583898.3] 1 Stip. & Order Approving Extension Re: CDCR’s Telepsychiatry Policy (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC)) Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 6789 Filed 07/27/20 Page 2 of 3 1 would meet and confer with Plaintiffs’ counsel and the Special Master concerning an extension of 2 that period. (Id.) 3 Since the Court approved the parties’ stipulation on March 27, Defendants have worked 4 diligently to construct and implement CDCR’s Telepsychiatry Resource Management Tool, and 5 educate mental health program staff throughout CDCR regarding the tool’s use. Working closely 6 with CDCR Information Technology staff, officials have made significant strides toward 7 developing a system to notify stakeholders of telepsychiatry’s use under the provisional policy, 8 but they have not been able to complete the tool given resource conflicts and operational 9 exigencies posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional time is needed so that CDCR can 10 complete and validate the Telepsychiatry Resource Management Tool, train statewide institution 11 staff to ensure accurate data entry, train headquarters staff to use the system and provide program 12 oversight, and implement to tool throughout CDCR’s mental health program sites. 13 On July 23, 2020, the parties met and conferred regarding an extension of the 14 implementation period with the Special Master and members of his team. Based on the report 15 provided by CDCR staff, the parties and Special Master agree that Defendants have been 16 diligently working on development of the Telepsychiatry Resource Management Tool, and that 17 giving Defendants additional time to complete and validate the tool and take further actions to 18 implement it throughout CDCR is appropriate. 19 Accordingly, the parties agree that the time for Defendants to complete the internal 20 monitoring process and implement CDCR’s provisional telepsychiatry policy shall be extended 21 by 30 days. If Defendants believe that a further extension of the implementation period is 22 needed, they will meet and confer with Plaintiffs’ counsel and the Special Master concerning an 23 extension. If no agreement is reached, Defendants may seek an order from the Court extending 24 the implementation period. 25 The Special Master has reviewed and concurs with this stipulation. 26 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 27 28 [3583898.3] 2 Stip. & Order Approving Extension Re: CDCR’s Telepsychiatry Policy (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC)) Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 6789 Filed 07/27/20 Page 3 of 3 1 Dated: July 24, 2020 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California ADRIANO HRVATIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General 2 3 4 /S/ Kyle A. Lewis 5 Kyle A. Lewis Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 6 7 Dated: July 24, 2020 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 8 9 /S/ Lisa Ells Lisa Ells Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 DATED: July 25, 2020. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [3583898.3] 3 Stip. & Order Approving Extension Re: CDCR’s Telepsychiatry Policy (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?