Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 6934

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/02/2020 DIRECTING the parties to file closing briefs by 11/13/2020 with defendants rebuttal closing brief due by 11/18/2020 and plaintiff's response to defendants' objections to plaintiffs' exhibit list due by 11/4/2020. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California MONICA N. ANDERSON Senior Assistant Attorney General ADRIANO HRVATIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General KYLE A. LEWIS, State Bar No. 201041 ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931 TYLER V. HEATH, State Bar No. 271478 Deputy Attorneys General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7318 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Elise.Thorn@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants 10 11 PAUL B. MELLO, State Bar No. 179755 LISA M. POOLEY, State Bar No. 168737 SAMANTHA D. WOLFF, State Bar No. 240280 LAUREL E. O’CONNOR, State Bar No. 305478 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 1676 N. California Boulevard, Suite 620 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 746-8460 Fax: (925) 746-8490 E-mail: PMello@hansonbridgett.com Attorneys for Defendants ROMAN M. SILBERFELD, State Bar No. 62783 GLENN A. DANAS, State Bar No. 270317 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 Telephone: (310) 552-0130 Fax: (310) 229-5800 E-mail: RSilberfeld@RobinsKaplan.com Special Counsel for Defendants 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Case No. 2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC) 17 18 v. 19 20 21 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CLOSING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOLLOWING EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND OBJECTIONS RESPONSE GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. Judge: The Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller 22 23 On October 23, 2020, the Court held an evidentiary hearing concerning transfers of 24 Coleman class members between the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 25 and the Department of State Hospitals to inpatient hospital beds. (ECF No. 6923.) At the 26 conclusion of testimony, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer regarding the filing of 27 closing briefs and noted that briefs would be limited to twenty pages, and to file their final exhibit 28 lists within one week. (Id.) Over the following week, the parties met and conferred regarding [3419376.1] 1 Stip. and Order Re: Closing Briefing & Objects. Response Schedule (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC)) 1 briefs and Defendants’ objections to Plaintiffs’ final exhibit list, and stipulate to the below 2 proposed schedule. 3 IT IS STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 4 1. The parties shall file closing briefs concerning the October 23, 2020 Coleman class 5 member inpatient hospital beds transfers evidentiary hearing by the end of the day on Friday, 6 November 13, 2020. Plaintiffs may file a closing brief up to twenty pages in length. Defendants 7 may file a closing brief up to fifteen pages in length, and shall reserve five pages of briefing for 8 closing rebuttal argument. The parties are not required to exchange briefs before filing. 9 10 11 12 2. Defendants shall file a rebuttal closing brief by the end of the day on Wednesday, November 18, 2020. 3. Plaintiffs shall file any response to Defendants’ objections to Plaintiffs’ exhibit list by the end of the day on Wednesday, November 4, 2020. 13 14 Dated: October 30, 2020 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California ADRIANO HRVATIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General 15 16 /s/ Kyle A. Lewis 17 KYLE A. LEWIS Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 18 19 20 Dated: October 30, 2020 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 21 /s/ Ernest Galvan 22 Ernest Galvan Attorneys for Plaintiffs 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 2, 2020. 26 27 28 [3419376.1] 2 Stip. and Order Re: Closing Briefing & Objects. Response Schedule (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?