Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
6934
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/02/2020 DIRECTING the parties to file closing briefs by 11/13/2020 with defendants rebuttal closing brief due by 11/18/2020 and plaintiff's response to defendants' objections to plaintiffs' exhibit list due by 11/4/2020. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
MONICA N. ANDERSON
Senior Assistant Attorney General
ADRIANO HRVATIN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
KYLE A. LEWIS, State Bar No. 201041
ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931
TYLER V. HEATH, State Bar No. 271478
Deputy Attorneys General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 210-7318
Fax: (916) 324-5205
E-mail: Elise.Thorn@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
10
11
PAUL B. MELLO, State Bar No. 179755
LISA M. POOLEY, State Bar No. 168737
SAMANTHA D. WOLFF, State Bar No. 240280
LAUREL E. O’CONNOR, State Bar No. 305478
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
1676 N. California Boulevard, Suite 620
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 746-8460
Fax: (925) 746-8490
E-mail: PMello@hansonbridgett.com
Attorneys for Defendants
ROMAN M. SILBERFELD, State Bar No. 62783
GLENN A. DANAS, State Bar No. 270317
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208
Telephone: (310) 552-0130
Fax: (310) 229-5800
E-mail: RSilberfeld@RobinsKaplan.com
Special Counsel for Defendants
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
15
16
RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
Case No. 2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC)
17
18
v.
19
20
21
Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING CLOSING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOLLOWING
EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND
OBJECTIONS RESPONSE
GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
Defendants. Judge: The Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
22
23
On October 23, 2020, the Court held an evidentiary hearing concerning transfers of
24
Coleman class members between the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
25
and the Department of State Hospitals to inpatient hospital beds. (ECF No. 6923.) At the
26
conclusion of testimony, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer regarding the filing of
27
closing briefs and noted that briefs would be limited to twenty pages, and to file their final exhibit
28
lists within one week. (Id.) Over the following week, the parties met and conferred regarding
[3419376.1]
1
Stip. and Order Re: Closing Briefing & Objects. Response Schedule (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC))
1
briefs and Defendants’ objections to Plaintiffs’ final exhibit list, and stipulate to the below
2
proposed schedule.
3
IT IS STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:
4
1.
The parties shall file closing briefs concerning the October 23, 2020 Coleman class
5
member inpatient hospital beds transfers evidentiary hearing by the end of the day on Friday,
6
November 13, 2020. Plaintiffs may file a closing brief up to twenty pages in length. Defendants
7
may file a closing brief up to fifteen pages in length, and shall reserve five pages of briefing for
8
closing rebuttal argument. The parties are not required to exchange briefs before filing.
9
10
11
12
2.
Defendants shall file a rebuttal closing brief by the end of the day on Wednesday,
November 18, 2020.
3.
Plaintiffs shall file any response to Defendants’ objections to Plaintiffs’ exhibit list by
the end of the day on Wednesday, November 4, 2020.
13
14
Dated: October 30, 2020
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
ADRIANO HRVATIN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
15
16
/s/ Kyle A. Lewis
17
KYLE A. LEWIS
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
18
19
20
Dated: October 30, 2020
ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
21
/s/ Ernest Galvan
22
Ernest Galvan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 2, 2020.
26
27
28
[3419376.1]
2
Stip. and Order Re: Closing Briefing & Objects. Response Schedule (2:90-cv-00520 KJM-DB (PC))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?