Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 7525

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/12/2022 STAYING Deadlines for Adjudicating Plaintiff-Intervenor Christopher Lipsey's claim pending settlement. (Rodriguez, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SHAWNA BALLARD, State Bar No. 155188 KATE FALKENSTIEN, State Bar No. 313753 Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 100 Marine Parkway, Suite 300 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 623-1401 Fax: (650) 623-1449 Email: sballard@reichmanjorgensen.com kfalkenstien@reichmanjorgensen.com BRIAN C. BARAN, State Bar No. 325939 Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 1909 K St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 894-7310 Fax: (650) 623-1449 Email: bbaran@reichmanjorgensen.com Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor Christopher Lipsey 15 ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 Attorney General of California MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970 Senior Assistant Attorney General DAMON MCCLAIN, State Bar No. 209508 Supervising Deputy Attorney General ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931 NAMRATA KOTWANI, State Bar No. 308741 Deputy Attorneys General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7318 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Namrata.Kotwani@doj.ca.gov 16 Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 20 RALPH COLEMAN, et al. 22 23 Case No. 2:90-cv-00520 KJM DB P Plaintiffs, v. 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 21 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP PAUL B. MELLO, State Bar No. 179755 SAMANTHA D. WOLFF, State Bar No. 240280 LAUREL E. O’CONNOR, State Bar No. 305478 DAVID C. CASARRUBIAS, State Bar No. 321994 1676 N. California Boulevard, Suite 620 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 746-8460 Fax: (925) 746-8490 E-mail: PMello@hansonbridgett.com GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING DEADLINES FOR ADJUDICATING PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY’S CLAIM PENDING SETTLEMENT Judge: Hon. Kimberly Mueller Action Filed: April 23, 1990 1 On February 25, 2022, the Court issued an order referring the issues raised in Plaintiff- 2 Intervenor Christopher Lipsey’s claim in intervention to Chief Magistrate Judge Kendall Newman for 3 mediation and extending the deadlines for adjudicating Lipsey’s claim to allow time for the parties to 4 explore settlement. See ECF No. 7478. That schedule calls for an April 29, 2022 fact discovery cutoff. 5 Id. ¶ 1. 6 At a March 22, 2022 settlement conference, the parties reached an agreement in principle, 7 “subject to submission of documents and approval by” the Court. ECF Nos. 7496, 7512. Defendants 8 circulated a draft settlement agreement on April 5, 2022. Lipsey and Plaintiffs will need time to review 9 the draft before it can be submitted for approval. 10 To allow time to finalize and seek the Court’s approval for the settlement without unnecessarily 11 expending additional resources on a claim that has settled in principle, the parties request that the 12 Court vacate the deadlines set forth in the February 25, 2022 Stipulation and Order, ECF No. 7478, 13 and all other pending discovery deadlines, including Lipsey’s deadline to respond to Defendants’ 14 Interrogatories to Plaintiff-Intervenor Lipsey, Set Two. If the parties are unable to finalize a settlement 15 or the Court disapproves the settlement, the parties will promptly propose a new schedule. 16 IT IS STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 17 The parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court order as follows: 18 1. The deadlines set forth in the February 25, 2022 Stipulation and Order, ECF No. 7478, 19 as well as all other pending discovery deadlines, including Lipsey’s deadline to respond to 20 Defendants’ Interrogatories to Plaintiff-Intervenor Lipsey, Set Two, are vacated. 21 2. If the parties have not finalized and submitted a settlement agreement for the Court’s 22 approval within forty-five days from the date of this order, the parties shall meet and confer 23 and file within sixty days from the date of this order a joint statement proposing a new schedule 24 for adjudication of Lipsey’s claim. 25 3. If the Court enters an order denying approval of the settlement, the parties shall meet 26 and confer and file within fourteen days of the entry of that order a joint statement proposing 27 a new schedule for adjudication of Lipsey’s claim. 28 1 Stipulation and Order Staying Deadlines for Lipsey’s Claim Pending Settlement (2:90-cv-00520 KJM DB (PC)) 1 4. In the event the parties are unable to agree to a new schedule should one be necessary 2 under paragraphs 2 or 3, the parties shall submit a schedule that provides three weeks to 3 respond to outstanding written discovery (including Defendants’ Interrogatories to Plaintiff- 4 Intervenor Lipsey, Set Two) and that otherwise tracks the time that was remaining as of 5 February 25, 2022 for each deadline. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: April 12, 2022 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Brian C. Baran /s/ Namrata Kotwani (as authorized on 4/11/22) REICHMAN JORGENSEN LEHMAN & FELDBERG LLP Shawna L. Ballard (SBN 155188) Kate Falkenstien (SBN 313753) 100 Marine Parkway, Suite 300 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 623-1401 Fax: (650) 623-1449 sballard@reichmanjorgensen.com kfalkenstien@reichmanjorgensen.com ROB BONTA Attorney General of California DAMON MCCLAIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General NAMRATA KOTWANI Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants REICHMAN JORGENSEN LEHMAN & FELDBERG LLP Brian C. Baran (SBN 325939) 1909 K St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 894-7310 Fax: (650) 623-1449 bbaran@reichmanjorgensen.com Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor Christopher Lipsey IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 12, 2022. 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation and Order Staying Deadlines for Lipsey’s Claim Pending Settlement (2:90-cv-00520 KJM DB (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?