Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 7566

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/08/2022 ADOPTING 7074 Special Master's 28th Round Monitoring Report, as supplemented by 7251 Addendum. (Rodriguez, E)

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7566 Filed 06/09/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P

v.

ORDER

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On March 5, 2021, the Special Master filed his Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring

17
18

Report (hereafter Report) ECF No. 7074. By order filed July 14, 2021, the court directed the

19

Special Master to, within fourteen days,

20

file an addendum to the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring Report
that (a) clarifies the method used to calculate the telepsychiatry
vacancy rate reported in the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring
Report; and (b) clarifies what documentation his team requested for
verification of custody and mental health staff training required by
the custody mental health partnership plan that defendants did not
provide, either in initial uploads or with their response to the draft
Report, and also makes such additional modifications to the Report,
if any, that may be required in connection with this clarification.

21
22
23
24
25

July 14, 2021 Order, ECF No. 7229, at 8. Except as specifically noted in the order, the court

26

overruled defendants’ objections to the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring Report and signaled it

27

anticipated “adopting the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring Report as supplemented.” Id.

28

/////
1

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7566 Filed 06/09/22 Page 2 of 2
1

On July 28, 2021, the Special Master filed the required addendum. ECF No. 7251.

2

As required, the addendum (a) clarifies the method used in the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring

3

Report to calculate the telepsychiatry vacancy rate reported there; and (b) clarifies what

4

documentation requested by his team to verify custody and mental health staff training required

5

by the custody mental partnership plan was not provided by defendants. With respect to the

6

clarification provided for category (b), the Special Master concluded it was not necessary to

7

revise the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring Report. ECF No. 7251 at 8.

8
9

Consistent with this court’s July 14, 2021 order, ECF No. 7229, and good cause
appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Special Master’s Twenty-Eighth Round

10

Monitoring Report, ECF No. 7074, is adopted as supplemented by the July 28, 2021 addendum

11

thereto, ECF No. 7251.

12

DATED: June 8, 2022.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2