Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 7735

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/21/23 RESETTING the hearing dates for 7720 Defendants' Merits Motion, 7719 Defendants' Administrative Motion and 7721 Plaintiffs' Motion to 3/24/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties' oppositions, if any, shall be filed no later than 3/2/23. The parties' replies, if any, shall be filed no later than 3/17/23. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7735 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 2 1 ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 Attorney General of California 2 MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970 Senior Assistant Attorney General 3 DAMON MCCLAIN, State Bar No. 209508 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 4 ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931 NAMRATA KOTWANI, State Bar No. 308741 5 Deputy Attorneys General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 6 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 7 Telephone: (916) 210-7318 Fax: (916) 324-5205 8 E-mail: Elise.Thorn@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants 9 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP PAUL B. MELLO, SBN 179755 SAMANTHA D. WOLFF, SBN 240280 KAYLEN KADOTANI, SBN 294114 DAVID C. CASARRUBIAS, SBN 321994 CARSON R. NIELLO, SBN 329970 1676 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITE 620 WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 TELEPHONE: 925-746-8460 FACSIMILE: 925-746-8490 Attorneys for Defendants 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES RE: SECOND GOLDING REPORT MOTIONS 16 Plaintiffs, v. 17 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al. 18 Defendants. Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller 19 20 On Thursday, February 9, 2023 the parties filed cross motions related to the Second 21 Golding Report. (ECF No. 7720 (Defendants’ Merits Motion); ECF No. 7719 (Defendants’ 22 Administrative Motion); ECF No. 7721 (Plaintiffs’ Motion); see also ECF No. 7700 (order 23 authorizing the filing of the parties’ motions).) The motions were regularly noticed with a hearing 24 date of April 28, 2023. 25 At the status conference held February 10, 2023, this Court suggested the parties move the 26 hearing date from April 28, 2023 to March 24, 2023. Following the hearing, counsel for the parties 27 met and conferred and agreed to move the hearing date for each of their noticed motions to March 28 24, 2023, and further agreed to extend the time for both sides to respond to the pending motions as 19365607.2 Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES RE: SECOND GOLDING REPORT MOTIONS Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7735 Filed 02/21/23 Page 2 of 2 1 follows: both parties’ respective oppositions would be due on March 2, 2023; both parties’ 2 respective replies would be due on March 17, 2023. 3 Accordingly, the parties request that the Court enter an order on this stipulation and reset 4 the hearing date and briefing deadlines accordingly. 5 DATED: February 15, 2023 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 6 7 By: 8 s/ Lisa Ells LISA ELLS Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 DATED: February 15, 2023 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 11 12 By: 13 14 s/ Samantha D. Wolff PAUL B. MELLO SAMANTHA D. WOLFF 15 ORDER 16 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the court hereby re-sets the hearing date for ECF 17 No. 7720 (Defendants’ Merits Motion), ECF No. 7719 (Defendants’ Administrative Motion), and 18 ECF No. 7721 (Plaintiffs’ Motion), currently set for April 28, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. to 19 March 24, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. The parties’ respective oppositions, if any, shall be filed no later 20 than March 2, 2023. The parties’ respective replies, if any, shall be filed no later than 21 March 17, 2023. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: February 21, 2023. 24 25 26 27 28 19365607.2 Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB -2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES RE: SECOND GOLDING REPORT MOTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?