Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
7735
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/21/23 RESETTING the hearing dates for 7720 Defendants' Merits Motion, 7719 Defendants' Administrative Motion and 7721 Plaintiffs' Motion to 3/24/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties' oppositions, if any, shall be filed no later than 3/2/23. The parties' replies, if any, shall be filed no later than 3/17/23. (Kastilahn, A)
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7735 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 2
1 ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668
Attorney General of California
2 MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970
Senior Assistant Attorney General
3 DAMON MCCLAIN, State Bar No. 209508
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
4 ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931
NAMRATA KOTWANI, State Bar No. 308741
5 Deputy Attorneys General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
6
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
7
Telephone: (916) 210-7318
Fax: (916) 324-5205
8
E-mail: Elise.Thorn@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
9
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
PAUL B. MELLO, SBN 179755
SAMANTHA D. WOLFF, SBN 240280
KAYLEN KADOTANI, SBN 294114
DAVID C. CASARRUBIAS, SBN 321994
CARSON R. NIELLO, SBN 329970
1676 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITE 620
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596
TELEPHONE: 925-746-8460
FACSIMILE: 925-746-8490
Attorneys for Defendants
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
14 RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES
RE: SECOND GOLDING REPORT
MOTIONS
16
Plaintiffs,
v.
17 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.
18
Defendants.
Judge:
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
19
20
On Thursday, February 9, 2023 the parties filed cross motions related to the Second
21 Golding Report. (ECF No. 7720 (Defendants’ Merits Motion); ECF No. 7719 (Defendants’
22 Administrative Motion); ECF No. 7721 (Plaintiffs’ Motion); see also ECF No. 7700 (order
23 authorizing the filing of the parties’ motions).) The motions were regularly noticed with a hearing
24 date of April 28, 2023.
25
At the status conference held February 10, 2023, this Court suggested the parties move the
26 hearing date from April 28, 2023 to March 24, 2023. Following the hearing, counsel for the parties
27 met and conferred and agreed to move the hearing date for each of their noticed motions to March
28 24, 2023, and further agreed to extend the time for both sides to respond to the pending motions as
19365607.2
Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES RE: SECOND GOLDING REPORT
MOTIONS
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7735 Filed 02/21/23 Page 2 of 2
1 follows: both parties’ respective oppositions would be due on March 2, 2023; both parties’
2 respective replies would be due on March 17, 2023.
3
Accordingly, the parties request that the Court enter an order on this stipulation and reset
4 the hearing date and briefing deadlines accordingly.
5 DATED: February 15, 2023
ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
6
7
By:
8
s/ Lisa Ells
LISA ELLS
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
10 DATED: February 15, 2023
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
11
12
By:
13
14
s/ Samantha D. Wolff
PAUL B. MELLO
SAMANTHA D. WOLFF
15
ORDER
16
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the court hereby re-sets the hearing date for ECF
17 No. 7720 (Defendants’ Merits Motion), ECF No. 7719 (Defendants’ Administrative Motion), and
18 ECF No. 7721 (Plaintiffs’ Motion), currently set for April 28, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. to
19 March 24, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. The parties’ respective oppositions, if any, shall be filed no later
20 than March 2, 2023. The parties’ respective replies, if any, shall be filed no later than
21 March 17, 2023.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23 DATED: February 21, 2023.
24
25
26
27
28
19365607.2
Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES RE: SECOND GOLDING REPORT
MOTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?