Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
7766
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/27/23 ORDERING that for the sake of clarity, going forward defendants shall report mental health vacancy data for positions allocated and filled under the 2009 Staffing Plan and modifica tions thereto separately from positions allocated and filled under the CDCR PIP Staffing Plan. Defendants shall include subtotals by classification for each subgroup (2009 Staffing Plan and CDCR PIP Staffing Plan) as well as totals by classificatio n to reflect systemwide fill or vacancy rates. Notwithstanding their contention that the medical assistant classification is not part of the 2009 Staffing Plan, defendants shall continue to report vacancy data for this classification. In addition, so that the court may correct page 2 of the 2/28/23 order at lines 12-17, defendants shall file WITHIN SEVEN DAYS an amended version of the monthly mental health staffing vacancy report filed 2/9/23, ECF No. 7717 . The amended version shall re port mental health vacancy data for positions allocated and filled under the 2009 Staffing Plan and modifications thereto separately from positions allocated and filled under the CDCR PIP Staffing Plan, and shall include vacancy data for the medical assistant classification. (Kastilahn, A)
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7766 Filed 03/17/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P
ORDER
GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
In the parties’ court-ordered March 14, 2023 Joint Statement, ECF No. 7761, plaintiffs
18
request clarification regarding whether the court’s February 28, 2023 order, ECF No. 7742,
19
covers vacancies in mental health positions in California Department of Corrections and
20
Rehabilitation Psychiatric Inpatient Programs (CDCR PIPs). ECF No. 7761 at 5-6. The February
21
28, 2023 order applies to CDCR’s 2009 Staffing Plan, ECF No. 3693, and the modifications
22
thereto, see ECF No 7742 at 1 n.1. The CDCR PIP Staffing Plan was filed July 21, 2021. ECF
23
No. 7245. Although defendants report on vacancies in the CDCR PIPs in their monthly vacancy
24
reports, those vacancies are not within the scope of the February 28, 2023 order. The court
25
anticipates separate proceedings, as necessary, to ensure a durable staffing remedy for CDCR’s
26
PIPs. See, e.g., ECF Nos. 7697, 7758.
27
28
For the sake of clarity, going forward defendants shall report mental health vacancy data
for positions allocated and filled under the 2009 Staffing Plan and modifications thereto
1
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7766 Filed 03/17/23 Page 2 of 2
1
separately from positions allocated and filled under the CDCR PIP Staffing Plan. Defendants
2
shall include subtotals by classification for each subgroup (2009 Staffing Plan and CDCR PIP
3
Staffing Plan) as well as totals by classification to reflect systemwide fill or vacancy
4
rates. Notwithstanding their contention that the medical assistant classification is not part of the
5
2009 Staffing Plan, defendants shall continue to report vacancy data for this classification.
6
In addition, so that the court may correct page 2 of the February 28, 2023 order at lines
7
12-17, defendants shall file WITHIN SEVEN DAYS an amended version of the monthly mental
8
health staffing vacancy report filed February 9, 2023, ECF No. 7717. The amended version shall
9
report mental health vacancy data for positions allocated and filled under the 2009 Staffing Plan
10
and modifications thereto separately from positions allocated and filled under the CDCR PIP
11
Staffing Plan, and shall include vacancy data for the medical assistant classification.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 17, 2023.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?