Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
7897
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/28/2023 ORDERING that The issues raised by the parties' joint statement will be added to the agenda for the 8/10/2023 Status Conference. Defendants shall immediately halt all VRJS/Falcon tours of CDCR prisons until further order of the court. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7897 Filed 07/28/23 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P
ORDER
v.
GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
With leave of court, ECF No. 7880, on July 25, 2023, the parties filed a joint statement
19
concerning disputes that have arisen over ongoing tours by a team of experts with Voorhis
20
Robertson Justice Services (VRJS) and Falcon, Inc. (together hereafter VRJS/Falcon). For the
21
reasons explained in this order, defendants shall suspend the tours immediately pending further
22
discussion at the August 10, 2023 status conference.
23
In October 2020, defendants contracted with VRJS/Falcon to assess, among other things,
24
CDCR’s mental health program, its staffing levels and staffing ratios, and its delivery of mental
25
health care. See Decl. of Falcon, ECF No. 7884, ¶ 2. In August 2022, VRJS/Falcon shared the
26
results of an 18-month study with defendants. Id. ¶ 4 & Ex. B. Thereafter, “CDCR retained
27
VRJS/Falcon to conduct a broader, systemwide study of CDCR’s Mental Health Services
28
/////
1
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7897 Filed 07/28/23 Page 2 of 4
1
delivery system.” Id. ¶ 5. VRJS/Falcon has hired approximately 30 experts to complete this
2
study. Id.
3
In April 2023, defense counsel Paul Mello sent a letter to plaintiffs’ counsel and the
4
Special Master notifying them of the planned VRJS/Falcon study and that the study would
5
include on-site visits in prisons, likely starting in July 2023. Decl. of McClain, ECF No. 7885,
6
¶ 2. On June 13, 2023, defense counsel Samantha Wolff sent an email to plaintiffs’ counsel and
7
the Special Master with specific tour dates for July and August. Id. ¶ 3. On June 20, 2023,
8
Ms. Wolff sent another email to plaintiffs’ counsel and the Special Master advising that the
9
VRJS/Falcon team wanted to interview patients and asking if plaintiffs would object. Id. On
10
June 22, 2023, plaintiffs’ counsel Michael Bien responded that plaintiffs did not consent to any
11
interviews by defense experts but that plaintiffs’ counsel might “cooperate in defendants’ efforts
12
to obtain interviews” if plaintiffs were provided enough information “to understand who will be
13
doing the interviews and for what purpose,” or perhaps if plaintiffs’ counsel were present and had
14
received “an opportunity to meet privately beforehand with the patient.” Id. ¶ 4. The parties have
15
had further discussions over the scope, if any, of patient interviews that may be conducted by the
16
VRJS/Falcon team. See, e.g., id. ¶¶ 7-8. Their joint statement reflects substantial disagreement at
17
this point over the permissible scope, if any, of patient interviews. See generally ECF No. 7883.
18
Broadly, the joint statement reflects disagreement over the purpose of these tours. Id.
19
More specifically, the parties disagree whether defendants must seek leave of court to reopen
20
discovery and conduct these tours and whether the court must set clear parameters for the tours.
21
Id. Defendants contend the tours are a “self-evaluation of their own system” consistent with their
22
“responsibility to ‘self-monitor, and as necessary, self-correct inadequacies in the delivery of
23
mental health care,’” and believe there is no court order requiring defendants to get permission
24
from the court for such tours. Id. at 8. The court is not persuaded.
25
Mr. Mello’s April 21, 2023 letter includes the following:
26
27
28
29
Please note that while Defendants have retained experts to evaluate the MHSDS,
Defendants have not made any decision to move for termination and are therefore
not providing notice pursuant to this Court’s February 21, 2018 Order. ECF 5794.
Defendants may, in the future, take action to terminate or modify all or parts of this
2
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7897 Filed 07/28/23 Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
case — or none at all — pending the experts’ determination and recommendation(s),
at which time Defendants will provide six months’ notice as required by this Court’s
February 21, 2018 Order.
Decl. of Bien, Ex. A, ECF No. 7886, at 14.
5
The court’s February 21, 2018 order requires defendants to provide at least six months’
6
notice before filing a motion for termination. February 21, 2018 Order, ECF No. 5794, at 10.
7
The court issued the order against the backdrop then of defendants’ prior termination motion,
8
following which the court found defendants had violated California Rules of Professional
9
Conduct 2-100 by conducting ex parte interviews with class members represented by counsel and
10
using those interviews to support the termination motion. Id. at 1-2 (quoting ECF No. 4539
11
at 20-21). Defendants also had arranged a second set of unilateral prison tours by defense
12
consultants in late December 2017 and January 2018 to evaluate defendants’ staffing plan. Id. at
13
4-5. The court set the six month notice period to “serve[ ] the purposes of Federal Rules of Civil
14
Procedure 16 and 26 by permitting an orderly period of discovery and expert disclosures to
15
inform any litigation.” Id. at 9. The court expressly stated it would “not set a specific schedule
16
for expert discovery” in advance of such notice; rather, in the event defendants did file such
17
notice “the court will then set a discovery scheduling conference within one week after the filing
18
of the notice.” Id.
19
Based on the current record, defendants’ present tours are remarkably similar in nature to
20
the prior tours that led the court to issue the February 21, 2018 order. The evidence before the
21
court now regarding defendants’ current contracts with VRJS/Falcon does not square with the
22
representations in Mr. Mello’s April 21, 2023 letter that these tours are simply in aid of their
23
“responsibility to ‘self-monitor, and, as necessary, self-correct inadequacies in the discovery of
24
mental health care.’” ECF No. 7883 at 8.
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
29
/////
3
Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Document 7897 Filed 07/28/23 Page 4 of 4
1
The issues raised by the parties’ joint statement will be added to the agenda for the
2
August 10, 2023 status conference. Defendants shall immediately halt all VRJS/Falcon tours of
3
CDCR prisons until further order of the court.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 28, 2023.
6
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?