Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
8103
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/27/2023 EXTENDING the parties' time to respond to the Special Master's Thirtieth round report part C.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1 ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668
Attorney General of California
2 MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970
Senior Assistant Attorney General
3 DAMON MCCLAIN, State Bar No. 209508
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
4 ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931
NAMRATA KOTWANI, State Bar No. 308741
5 Deputy Attorneys General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
6
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
7
Telephone: (916) 210-7318
Fax: (916) 324-5205
8
E-mail: Elise.Thorn@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
9
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI, SBN 114710
PAUL B. MELLO, SBN 179755
SAMANTHA D. WOLFF, SBN 240280
KAYLEN KADOTANI, SBN 294114
DAVID C. CASARRUBIAS, SBN 321994
CARSON R. NIELLO, SBN 329970
1676 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITE 620
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596
TELEPHONE: 925-746-8460
FACSIMILE: 925-746-8490
Attorneys for Defendants
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
14 RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING THE PARTIES’ TIME TO
RESPOND TO THE SPECIAL MASTER’S
THIRTIETH ROUND REPORT PART C
16
Plaintiffs,
v.
17 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.
18
Defendants.
Judge:
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
19
20
On December 22, 2023, the Special Master filed the Thirtieth Round Monitoring Report –
21 Part C: Special Master’s Monitoring Report on the California Department of Corrections and
22 Rehabilitation’s Institutions with Enhanced Outpatient Programs Compliance with Provisionally
23 Approved Plans, Policies, and Protocols (“Report”). (ECF No. 8095.) The parties’ responses to
24 this Report are due ten days later, on New Year’s Day. (ECF No. 640.) Due to the holiday, the
25 deadline is automatically extended to the next business day, January 2, 2024. Fed. R. Civ. P.
26 6(a)(1)(C). Defendants are working diligently but cannot prepare a timely and fulsome response
27 to the Report without a brief extension of time, as client representatives who would otherwise
28 assist with providing information necessary to the response are off work in light of the holidays.
20255751.1
Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB
1
STIP. & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 30TH ROUND REPORT PART C
1
Defendants approached Plaintiffs and requested that Plaintiffs agree to a 10-day extension
2 of time, up to and including January 12, 2024, for the parties to file responses or objections to the
3 Report. Plaintiffs are amenable to that proposal. The parties further agreed that each party will
4 have until February 1, 2024, to file responses to the other party’s objections or responses to the
5 Report if they determine such a response is necessary.
6
Accordingly, the parties request that the court extend the deadline to file responses or
7 objections to the Report to January 12, 2024, and order that any responses to the objections or
8 responses be filed by February 1, 2024.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10 DATED: December 26, 2023
ROB BONTA
Attorney General of California
11
12
By:
13
14
15
/s/ Damon McClain
DAMON MCCLAIN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ELISE OWENS THORN
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
16
17
DATED: December 26, 2023
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
18
By:
19
20
21
/s/ Samantha Wolff
LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI
PAUL B. MELLO
SAMANTHA D. WOLFF
Attorneys for Defendants
22
23 DATED: December 26, 2023
ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
24
By:
25
26
/s/ Jenny Yelin
Jenny Yelin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
27
28 / / /
20255751.1
Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB
2
STIP. & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 30TH ROUND REPORT PART C
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 DATED: December 27, 2023.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20255751.1
Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB
3
STIP. & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 30TH ROUND REPORT PART C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?