Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 8103

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/27/2023 EXTENDING the parties' time to respond to the Special Master's Thirtieth round report part C.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 Attorney General of California 2 MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970 Senior Assistant Attorney General 3 DAMON MCCLAIN, State Bar No. 209508 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 4 ELISE OWENS THORN, State Bar No. 145931 NAMRATA KOTWANI, State Bar No. 308741 5 Deputy Attorneys General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 6 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 7 Telephone: (916) 210-7318 Fax: (916) 324-5205 8 E-mail: Elise.Thorn@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants 9 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI, SBN 114710 PAUL B. MELLO, SBN 179755 SAMANTHA D. WOLFF, SBN 240280 KAYLEN KADOTANI, SBN 294114 DAVID C. CASARRUBIAS, SBN 321994 CARSON R. NIELLO, SBN 329970 1676 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITE 620 WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 TELEPHONE: 925-746-8460 FACSIMILE: 925-746-8490 Attorneys for Defendants 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE PARTIES’ TIME TO RESPOND TO THE SPECIAL MASTER’S THIRTIETH ROUND REPORT PART C 16 Plaintiffs, v. 17 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al. 18 Defendants. Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller 19 20 On December 22, 2023, the Special Master filed the Thirtieth Round Monitoring Report – 21 Part C: Special Master’s Monitoring Report on the California Department of Corrections and 22 Rehabilitation’s Institutions with Enhanced Outpatient Programs Compliance with Provisionally 23 Approved Plans, Policies, and Protocols (“Report”). (ECF No. 8095.) The parties’ responses to 24 this Report are due ten days later, on New Year’s Day. (ECF No. 640.) Due to the holiday, the 25 deadline is automatically extended to the next business day, January 2, 2024. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 6(a)(1)(C). Defendants are working diligently but cannot prepare a timely and fulsome response 27 to the Report without a brief extension of time, as client representatives who would otherwise 28 assist with providing information necessary to the response are off work in light of the holidays. 20255751.1 Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB 1 STIP. & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 30TH ROUND REPORT PART C 1 Defendants approached Plaintiffs and requested that Plaintiffs agree to a 10-day extension 2 of time, up to and including January 12, 2024, for the parties to file responses or objections to the 3 Report. Plaintiffs are amenable to that proposal. The parties further agreed that each party will 4 have until February 1, 2024, to file responses to the other party’s objections or responses to the 5 Report if they determine such a response is necessary. 6 Accordingly, the parties request that the court extend the deadline to file responses or 7 objections to the Report to January 12, 2024, and order that any responses to the objections or 8 responses be filed by February 1, 2024. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 DATED: December 26, 2023 ROB BONTA Attorney General of California 11 12 By: 13 14 15 /s/ Damon McClain DAMON MCCLAIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General ELISE OWENS THORN Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 DATED: December 26, 2023 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 18 By: 19 20 21 /s/ Samantha Wolff LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI PAUL B. MELLO SAMANTHA D. WOLFF Attorneys for Defendants 22 23 DATED: December 26, 2023 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 24 By: 25 26 /s/ Jenny Yelin Jenny Yelin Attorneys for Plaintiffs 27 28 / / / 20255751.1 Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB 2 STIP. & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 30TH ROUND REPORT PART C 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 DATED: December 27, 2023. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20255751.1 Case No. 2:90-CV-00520- KJM-DB 3 STIP. & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 30TH ROUND REPORT PART C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?