Gordon v. Wong, et al

Filing 376

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/14/14 ORDERING that Petitioner will file a motion for evidentiary hearing by April 6, 2015. Respondent will file a response to the motion for evidentiary hearing on October 5, 2015. A further Status/Scheduling conference is set for May 6, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
MICHEL P. FARRELL, State Bar No. 183566
Senior Assistant Attorney General
WARD A. CAMPBELL, State Bar No. 88555
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Respondent

8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14

PATRICK BRUCE GORDON,

Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE

15
v.

16
17
18

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

SCHEDULING ORDER - - - - - - - - [DRAFT]

KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, California
State Prison at San Quentin,

19
20

CIV S 91-0882 MCE EFB

Respondent.
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with this petition for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. A Status/Scheduling conference was held in the
courtroom of the undersigned on October 1, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. Joan M. Fisher of the Federal
Defender's Office Eastern District Of California was present for the Petitioner. Ward A.
Campbell, Supervising Deputy Attorney, California Department of Justice was present for the
Respondent.
Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:
1.

Petitioner will file a motion for evidentiary hearing by April 6, 2015.
1
-------Scheduling Order [Draft]- (CIV S 91-0882 MCE EFB)

1
2
3

2.

Respondent will file a response to the motion for evidentiary hearing on October 5,

3.

A further Status/Scheduling conference is set for May 6, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in

2015.

4

Courtroom No. 8. The purpose of the conference will be to discuss whether the parties will be

5

filing motions for discovery and/or expansion of the record. If necessary, the court and the

6

parties will discuss any necessary rescheduling of the filing date for respondent’s response to the

7

motion for evidentiary motion.

8

Dated: October 14, 2014.

9
10
11
12

_____________________________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Scheduling Order [Draft] (CIV S 91-0882 MCE EFB)