Roberts v. Ayers, et al

Filing 426

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/6/12 ORDERING that pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, the Order filed March 28, 2012 421 is hereby modified as follows: The parties shall meet and confer regardin g petitioners Motion to Seal at a mutually convenient time prior to the July 11, 2012, status conference now set in this case, and shall be prepared to report orally at the conference regarding the extent of their agreement and/or disagreement regarding the outstanding requests to seal and scope of any protective order(s).(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424
Federal Defender
ALLISON CLAIRE, Bar #170138
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
ROBERT BLOOM
3355 Richmond Blvd.
Oakland, California 94611
Telephone: [phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Petitioner
LARRY ROBERTS

9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14

LARRY ROBERTS,
Petitioner,

15
v.

16
17

WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison,
Respondents.

18
19

_______________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. CIV S-93-0254 GEB DAD DP
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE RE:
PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL
DEATH PENALTY CASE

20
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, the Order filed March 28, 2012

21
22

(Document 421) is hereby modified as follows:
The parties shall meet and confer regarding petitioner’s Motion to Seal at a mutually convenient

23
24

time prior to the July 11, 2012, status conference now set in this case, and shall be prepared to report

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////

[Proposed] Order

Roberts v. Warden, CIV-S-93-0254 GEB DAD DP

1

orally at the conference regarding the extent of their agreement and/or disagreement regarding the

2

outstanding requests to seal and scope of any protective order(s).

3

DATED: June 6, 2012.

4
5
6
7

dad1.capital
roberts.modsched.0606

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[Proposed] Order

Roberts v. Warden, CIV-S-93-0254 GEB DAD DP