Breaux v. Ornoski, et al

Filing 241

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/20/13 ORDERING that in keeping with the order of July 10, 2012, and the previous orders referenced therein, the parties shall file statements on or before July 8, 2013, regarding the scope of the evidentiary hearing necessary to resolve the outstanding claims in this action. The court will set a status conference after it receives and considers the parties statements.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DAVID A. BREAUX 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:93-CV-0570 JAM DAD P vs. S.W. ORNOSKI, et al. 15 Respondent. 16 ORDER / 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner on death row. He is proceeding through counsel with 18 an application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 10, 2012, the 19 undersigned issued findings and recommendations and ordered that within twenty-one days of 20 the district judge’s final order on those findings and recommendations, the parties file statements 21 regarding the scope of the evidentiary hearing as discussed at the conference held November 7, 22 2005, and as set forth in the findings and recommendations of January 6, 2004. (See Docket No. 23 226 at 19.) On June 13, 2013, the district judge approved and adopted the findings and 24 recommendations of July 10, 2013. 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that in keeping with the order of July 10, 2012, 2 and the previous orders referenced therein, the parties shall file statements on or before July 8, 3 2013, regarding the scope of the evidentiary hearing necessary to resolve the outstanding claims in 4 this action. The court will set a status conference after it receives and considers the parties’ 5 statements. 6 DATED: June 20, 2013. 7 8 9 10 hm brea0570.ord 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?