Breaux v. Ornoski, et al
Filing
241
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/20/13 ORDERING that in keeping with the order of July 10, 2012, and the previous orders referenced therein, the parties shall file statements on or before July 8, 2013, regarding the scope of the evidentiary hearing necessary to resolve the outstanding claims in this action. The court will set a status conference after it receives and considers the parties statements.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
DAVID A. BREAUX
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:93-CV-0570 JAM DAD P
vs.
S.W. ORNOSKI, et al.
15
Respondent.
16
ORDER
/
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner on death row. He is proceeding through counsel with
18
an application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 10, 2012, the
19
undersigned issued findings and recommendations and ordered that within twenty-one days of
20
the district judge’s final order on those findings and recommendations, the parties file statements
21
regarding the scope of the evidentiary hearing as discussed at the conference held November 7,
22
2005, and as set forth in the findings and recommendations of January 6, 2004. (See Docket No.
23
226 at 19.) On June 13, 2013, the district judge approved and adopted the findings and
24
recommendations of July 10, 2013.
25
////
26
////
1
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that in keeping with the order of July 10, 2012,
2
and the previous orders referenced therein, the parties shall file statements on or before July 8,
3
2013, regarding the scope of the evidentiary hearing necessary to resolve the outstanding claims in
4
this action. The court will set a status conference after it receives and considers the parties’
5
statements.
6
DATED: June 20, 2013.
7
8
9
10
hm
brea0570.ord
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?