Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 1643

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/17/2011 ORDERING that Dfts shall file a Motion to Enforce Penal Code § 3044 and to Modify the Permanent Injunction by 8/31/2011. Pltfs shall file a Motion to Enforce the Injunction by 8/31/20 11. Opposition briefs to those motions shall be filed by 10/3/2011. Reply briefs may be filed by 10/18/2011. The motions shall be heard on 11/4/2011 at 10:00 a.m.. Parties may request discovery for the purpose of opposing the other party's motio n by 9/14/2011. Nothing in this Order or prior Orders regarding the procedures and scheduling for the motions on remand regarding Proposition 9 shall be construed as limiting the Pltfs' to monitor compliance with the Permanent Injunction in this case, as set forth in 25 of the Injunction. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
-GGH Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al Doc. 1643 1 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP GEOFFREY THOMAS HOLTZ ­ 191370 2 Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 3 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 4 PRISON LAW OFFICE 5 DONALD SPECTER ­ 83925 1917 Fifth Street 6 Berkeley, California 94710-1916 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 7 Facsimile: (510) 280-2704 8 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP MICHAEL W. BIEN ­ 096891 9 ERNEST GALVAN ­ 196065 MARIA V. MORRIS ­ 223903 10 315 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor 11 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone (415) 433-6830 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 15 16 17 JERRY VALDIVIA, et al., 18 19 20 vs. Plaintiffs, ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING REGARDING PROPOSITION 9 REMAND PROCEEDINGS Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK/GGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 [485063-1] [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING REGARDING PROPOSITION 9 REMAND PROCEEDINGS ­ CASE NO. CIV. S-94-0671 LKK/GGH Dockets.Justia.com 1 Having reviewed the relevant pleadings, and good cause appearing, the Court modifies the 2 schedule for briefing and hearing regarding Proposition 9, § 5.3 remand proceedings. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: March 17, 2011. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [485063-1] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants shall file a Motion to Enforce Penal Code § 3044 and to Modify the Permanent Injunction on or before August 31, 2011. 2. Plaintiffs shall file a Motion to Enforce the Injunction on or before August 31, 2011. 3. 4. 5. 6. Opposition briefs to those motions shall be filed on or before October 3, 2011. Reply briefs may be filed on or before October 18, 2011. The motions shall be heard on November 4, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. Parties may request discovery for the purpose of opposing the other party's motion on or before September 14, 2011. Such requests will be treated in a similar manner to requests for discovery in the summary judgment context. If the Court grants a request for discovery, the briefing schedule will be modified. 7. Nothing in this Order or prior Orders regarding the procedures and scheduling for the motions on remand regarding Proposition 9 shall be construed as limiting the Plaintiffs' to monitor compliance with the Permanent Injunction in this case, as set forth in ¶ 25 of the Injunction. IT IS SO ORDERED. [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING REGARDING PROPOSITION 9 REMAND PROCEEDINGS ­ CASE NO. CIV. S-94-0671 LKK/GGH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?