Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
1664
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/13/2011 ORDERING 1647 The court has considered the report and ADOPTS the Special Master's F & R's in full; Further, the court HEREBY FINDS that dfts have demonstrated substantial compl iance with the following requirements: pltfs' counsel has access to the information reasonably necessary to monitor compliance; and Deputy Commissioners shall not have authority to increase the Return to Custody Assessment at the Probable Cause Hearing; these requirements will therefore no longer be a primary focus of pltfs' or the Special Master's monitoring unless they are inextricably linked with review of the hearing process, the remedial sanctions obligations of the Permanent Injunction, or arise in the course of investigating an individual parolee's situation; these items will remain in this status unless and until it comes to the parties' or the Special Master's attention that there has been a significant decline in compliance; to allow for such attention, dfts SHALL report the status of these requirements to all parties every 6 months, beginning on 1/8/2012. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
JERRY VALDIVIA, ALFRED YANCY,
and HOSSIE WELCH, on their own
behalf and on behalf of the class
of all persons similarly situated,
12
NO. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
O R D E R
14
15
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of
the State of California, et al.,
16
Defendants.
/
17
18
The Special Master filed his Tenth Report on April 21, 2011.
19
(Doc. No. 1647). No objections were filed. The court has considered
20
the
21
recommendations in full.
22
report
Further,
23
demonstrated
24
•
the
ADOPTS
court
26
substantial
the
Special
HEREBY
FINDS
compliance
Master’s
that
with
findings
defendants
requirements:
25
and
the
Plaintiffs’ counsel has access to the information
reasonably necessary to monitor compliance; and
1
and
have
following
1
•
Deputy Commissioners shall not have authority to increase
2
the Return to Custody Assessment at the Probable Cause
3
Hearing.
4
These requirements will therefore no longer be a primary focus of
5
Plaintiffs' or the Special Master's monitoring unless they are
6
inextricably
7
remedial sanctions obligations of the Permanent Injunction, or
8
arise in the course of investigating an individual parolee's
9
situation. These items will remain in this status unless and until
10
it comes to the parties’ or the Special Master’s attention that
11
there has been a significant decline in compliance. To allow for
12
such
13
requirements to all parties every six months, beginning on January
14
8, 2012.
linked
attention,
with
review
defendants
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
SHALL
DATED: May 13, 2011.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
of
the
report
hearing
the
process,
status
of
the
these
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?