Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 1664

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/13/2011 ORDERING 1647 The court has considered the report and ADOPTS the Special Master's F & R's in full; Further, the court HEREBY FINDS that dfts have demonstrated substantial compl iance with the following requirements: pltfs' counsel has access to the information reasonably necessary to monitor compliance; and Deputy Commissioners shall not have authority to increase the Return to Custody Assessment at the Probable Cause Hearing; these requirements will therefore no longer be a primary focus of pltfs' or the Special Master's monitoring unless they are inextricably linked with review of the hearing process, the remedial sanctions obligations of the Permanent Injunction, or arise in the course of investigating an individual parolee's situation; these items will remain in this status unless and until it comes to the parties' or the Special Master's attention that there has been a significant decline in compliance; to allow for such attention, dfts SHALL report the status of these requirements to all parties every 6 months, beginning on 1/8/2012. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 JERRY VALDIVIA, ALFRED YANCY, and HOSSIE WELCH, on their own behalf and on behalf of the class of all persons similarly situated, 12 NO. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH Plaintiffs, 13 v. O R D E R 14 15 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California, et al., 16 Defendants. / 17 18 The Special Master filed his Tenth Report on April 21, 2011. 19 (Doc. No. 1647). No objections were filed. The court has considered 20 the 21 recommendations in full. 22 report Further, 23 demonstrated 24 • the ADOPTS court 26 substantial the Special HEREBY FINDS compliance Master’s that with findings defendants requirements: 25 and the Plaintiffs’ counsel has access to the information reasonably necessary to monitor compliance; and 1 and have following 1 • Deputy Commissioners shall not have authority to increase 2 the Return to Custody Assessment at the Probable Cause 3 Hearing. 4 These requirements will therefore no longer be a primary focus of 5 Plaintiffs' or the Special Master's monitoring unless they are 6 inextricably 7 remedial sanctions obligations of the Permanent Injunction, or 8 arise in the course of investigating an individual parolee's 9 situation. These items will remain in this status unless and until 10 it comes to the parties’ or the Special Master’s attention that 11 there has been a significant decline in compliance. To allow for 12 such 13 requirements to all parties every six months, beginning on January 14 8, 2012. linked attention, with review defendants 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 SHALL DATED: May 13, 2011. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 of the report hearing the process, status of the these

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?