Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
1690
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/1/2011. Clerk directed to pay Chase Riveland, Special Master, the amount of $17,050.75 in accordance with attached Statement. A copy of this Order shall be served financial department. (Attachments: # 1 Special Master's Statement for Fees) [cc: CFS] (Marciel, M)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Valdivia et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH
Brown et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________/
The Special Master hereby submits his statement for fees and disbursements for the
period of August 1 thru August 31, 2011.
Chase Riveland, Special Master
Services
Disbursements
Total amount due
Virginia Morrison, Deputy Special Master
Services
Disbursements
$ 5,800.00
$ -0$ 5,800.00
$ 9,397.00
$ 908.75
Total amount due
Nancy Campbell, Deputy Special Master
Services
Disbursements
Total amount due
$ 10,305.75
$ 945.00
$
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE REIMBURSED:
$ 945.00
$ 17,050.75
Receipts for justification of reported expenditures are available upon request.
Respectfully submitted,
Chase Riveland
/s/ Chase Riveland
September 1, 2011
Special Master
OFFICE OF THE VALDIVIA SPECIAL MASTER
TO:
Ms. Leslie Medina, Financial Administrator
FROM:
/S/ Chase Riveland
Chase Riveland, Special Master, Valdivia
Date:
September 1, 2011
RE:
Reimbursement for fees and disbursements expended during the period
ending August 31, 2011.
Please send the check to the following individual for the amount indicated.
Chase Riveland
Valdivia Special Master
5714 Deer Harbor Road
Box 367
Deer Harbor, WA 98243
Amount to be reimbursed: $17,050.75
Valdivia et al. v. Brown et al.
No. CIV S-94-671 LKK/GGH
For: Chase Riveland
Tax #: 390-40-6490
Fees for August 2011
8/1/11
Correspondence: Campbell, Jacob,; review materials
.6
8/2/11
Correspondence: Riley, Jacob, Galvan, Court; review materials;
telephone Defendants, Plaintiffs
.9
8/3/11
Correspondence: Xiong, Galvan, Court; review materials
.6
8/4/11
Correspondence: Blake; review materials
.4
8/5/11
Correspondence: Christian, Court, Stilber; review materials;
telephone: Defendants, Court
.8
Correspondence: Morrison, Campbell; telephone: Campbell,
Morrison; review materials
1.4
8/7/11
8/8/11
Correspondence: Carvo, Morrison; review CalPAP and
Defendant reports
.8
8/9/11
Correspondence: Morrison, Riley, Court; review materials
.7
8/10/11
Correspondence: Jacob, Riley, Christian, Morrison, Shaffer,
Campbell; conference call w/Defendants and OSM; review
Materials
2.8
Correspondence: Huey, Campbell, Dolin; review Defendant
document production, Plaintiff response to translated documents
1.7
Correspondence: Stilberr, Jacob, Morrison, Campbell, Prewitt;
review Plaintiff response to Defendant Substantial Compliance
report, CalPAP MIS list, Defendant RSTS report
1.9
8/11/11
8/12/11
8/13/11
Correspondence: Morrison; review materials
.5
8/15/11
8/16/11
Correspondence: Riley, Morrison; telephone: Morrison, Shaffer,
Buffleben, Riley, Skiopper-Dota; review materials
1.8
Correspondence: Morrison, Campbell, Xiong, Neil; review
materials
.4
8/17/11
Correspondence: Casanas, Morrison, Campbell; review Armstrong
briefs; telephone with Defendants; review materials
2.7
8/18/11
Correspondence: Campbell, Morrison; review materials
8/19/11
Correspondence: Kogen, Morrison, Campbell; telephone: Bien,
Rice; review CalPAP statistics for July
1.3
Correspondence: Carvo, Jacob, Prewitt, Morrison, Campbell;
telephone: Campbell, Bien; review additional CalPAP materials
for July
1.8
8/22/11
8/23/11
.4
Correspondence: Bien, Morrison, Campbell, Jacob; review
materials; telephone w/Defendants
.9
Correspondence: Christian, Jacob, Roudebush; review Plaintiff
report re: Placer County Jail monitoring
.7
8/25/11
Correspondence: Blake, Riley, Huey; review materials
.6
8/26/11
Correspondence: Hennessey, Campbell, Morrison, Rice, Bien,
Prewitt, Jacob, Ruslani; review Plaintiff Region II report and
CalPAP report; and materials
1.0
Correspondence: Morrison, Campbell, Stilber, Jacob, Fischer,
Bien, Court; telephone: Court, Defendants; review materials
1.3
Correspondence: Morrison, Carvo, Jacob, Campbell; telephone:
Bien, Jacob; review materials
1.2
8/24/11
8/29/11
8/30/11
8/31/11
Correspondence: Campbell; prepare OSM billing for August;
review materials
1.8
29.0
* 0 Hrs. @ $ 90/hr. = $ -0- and 29 hrs. @ $200/hr. = $ 5,800 = $ 5,800.00
* travel time @ $90/hr.
Expenses for August 2
-$0Total Fees and Expenses: $+ $ -0- = $
Valdivia et al. v. Brown et al., No. CIV S-94-671 LKK/GGH
Collaboration Specialists
Services rendered by Virginia Morrison
Tax #: 51-0433003
Fees for August 2011
Date_________________Activity_________________________________Time/Hours
8/1/11
Review and respond to email communication; telephone conference
w/plaintiffs
0.2
8/1/11
Travel from San Anselmo to Los Angeles for LACJ visit
5.5*
8/2/11
Review email communication; observe parolee interviews at LACJ
4.1
8/3/11
Telephone conferences w/defendants and plaintiffs re: monitoring;
review email communication
0.3
8/4/11
Observe proceedings at LACJ
5.5
8/4/11
Travel within Los Angeles and from Los Angeles to San Anselmo
6.8*
8/6/11
Review documents
0.3
8/8/11
Review and respond to email communication; telephone conference
w/defendants re: mentally ill parolees; observe task force meeting and
write related notes; analyze RSTS records
0.9
8/10/11
Telephone conference w/defendants and OSM
0.7
8/11/11
Telephone conference w/defendants re: RSTS; review email
communication
0.25
8/12/11
Review email communication
0.1
8/15/11
Telephone conference w/C. Riveland; review and analyze RSTS and
related documents; email communication w/defendants
1.8
8/16/11
Telephone conferences w/defendants and plaintiffs; review and
respond to email communication; review and analyze RSTS material
1.5
8/17/11
Telephone conferences w/defendants re: RSTS and regulations; email
communication w/OSM team; review documents
2.3
8/18/11
Review and analyze documents; email communication w/defendants
4.75
8/19/11
Review and analyze documents; email communication w/defendants
3.0
8/22/11
Review and respond to email communication; review and analyze
documents; telephone conference w/defendants re: RSTS
2.4
8/23/11
Review and respond to email communication; telephone conferences
w/defendants and CalPAP re: data; review and analyze documents
6.3
8/24/11
Review and analyze documents; telephone conference w/defendants re:
data
3.3
8/25/11
Telephone conference w/N. Campbell; review and analyze documents
0.6
8/26/11
Review and respond to email communication; review documents
0.4
8/29/11
Review and analyze documents
2.75
Total……………………………………………………………………………..
41.45 X $200/hour = $ 8,290
12.3 X $ 90/hour = $ 1,107
$ 9,397
* denotes travel time at lower rate
Disbursements/Expenses for August 2011
Date
Amount
Activity
8/1/11
Airfare for Los Angeles site visit
8/4/11
Airport parking for Los Angeles site visit
8/4/11
Rental car and gas for Los Angeles site visit
194.86
8/4/11
Hotel during Los Angeles site visit
323.24
8/4/11
Mileage and tolls between San Anselmo and San Francisco Airport (64
miles at 51 cents per mile)
38.64
8/4/11
Parking during Los Angeles site visit
22.00
8/4/11
Meals during Los Angeles site visit
127.63
Total…………………………………….…………………..………………$
Total Fees and Expenses: $ 10,305.75
159.40
42.98
908.75
Valdivia et al. v. Brown et. al., No. CIV S-94-671 LKK/GGH
For: Nancy Campbell
Tax #: 060-40-9849
Fees for August 2011
Date
8/4/11
Activity
Time/Hours
8/29/11
Review Ds DEC and Release Memos; Review corr re:
1.25
realignment; review AB 109 document; P27 responses
Monthly Ds Call; Review DEC training; Review Draft
1.50
regs, Hearing Directive and Ds corr re: realignment
Review Ps response to Ds SC report; Review Ds RSTS report;
2.00
Review monitoring reports and revised hearing directive and regs
Review realignment corr and policies; Review RSTS report
.50
Total
…………………………………………………………………….. 5.25
8/10/11
8/16/11
5.25 X $180/hour= $945.00
Total Fees
945.00
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?