Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 1690

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/1/2011. Clerk directed to pay Chase Riveland, Special Master, the amount of $17,050.75 in accordance with attached Statement. A copy of this Order shall be served financial department. (Attachments: # 1 Special Master's Statement for Fees) [cc: CFS] (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Valdivia et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH Brown et al., Defendants. _____________________/ The Special Master hereby submits his statement for fees and disbursements for the period of August 1 thru August 31, 2011. Chase Riveland, Special Master Services Disbursements Total amount due Virginia Morrison, Deputy Special Master Services Disbursements $ 5,800.00 $ -0$ 5,800.00 $ 9,397.00 $ 908.75 Total amount due Nancy Campbell, Deputy Special Master Services Disbursements Total amount due $ 10,305.75 $ 945.00 $ TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE REIMBURSED: $ 945.00 $ 17,050.75 Receipts for justification of reported expenditures are available upon request. Respectfully submitted, Chase Riveland /s/ Chase Riveland September 1, 2011 Special Master OFFICE OF THE VALDIVIA SPECIAL MASTER TO: Ms. Leslie Medina, Financial Administrator FROM: /S/ Chase Riveland Chase Riveland, Special Master, Valdivia Date: September 1, 2011 RE: Reimbursement for fees and disbursements expended during the period ending August 31, 2011. Please send the check to the following individual for the amount indicated. Chase Riveland Valdivia Special Master 5714 Deer Harbor Road Box 367 Deer Harbor, WA 98243 Amount to be reimbursed: $17,050.75 Valdivia et al. v. Brown et al. No. CIV S-94-671 LKK/GGH For: Chase Riveland Tax #: 390-40-6490 Fees for August 2011 8/1/11 Correspondence: Campbell, Jacob,; review materials .6 8/2/11 Correspondence: Riley, Jacob, Galvan, Court; review materials; telephone Defendants, Plaintiffs .9 8/3/11 Correspondence: Xiong, Galvan, Court; review materials .6 8/4/11 Correspondence: Blake; review materials .4 8/5/11 Correspondence: Christian, Court, Stilber; review materials; telephone: Defendants, Court .8 Correspondence: Morrison, Campbell; telephone: Campbell, Morrison; review materials 1.4 8/7/11 8/8/11 Correspondence: Carvo, Morrison; review CalPAP and Defendant reports .8 8/9/11 Correspondence: Morrison, Riley, Court; review materials .7 8/10/11 Correspondence: Jacob, Riley, Christian, Morrison, Shaffer, Campbell; conference call w/Defendants and OSM; review Materials 2.8 Correspondence: Huey, Campbell, Dolin; review Defendant document production, Plaintiff response to translated documents 1.7 Correspondence: Stilberr, Jacob, Morrison, Campbell, Prewitt; review Plaintiff response to Defendant Substantial Compliance report, CalPAP MIS list, Defendant RSTS report 1.9 8/11/11 8/12/11 8/13/11 Correspondence: Morrison; review materials .5 8/15/11 8/16/11 Correspondence: Riley, Morrison; telephone: Morrison, Shaffer, Buffleben, Riley, Skiopper-Dota; review materials 1.8 Correspondence: Morrison, Campbell, Xiong, Neil; review materials .4 8/17/11 Correspondence: Casanas, Morrison, Campbell; review Armstrong briefs; telephone with Defendants; review materials 2.7 8/18/11 Correspondence: Campbell, Morrison; review materials 8/19/11 Correspondence: Kogen, Morrison, Campbell; telephone: Bien, Rice; review CalPAP statistics for July 1.3 Correspondence: Carvo, Jacob, Prewitt, Morrison, Campbell; telephone: Campbell, Bien; review additional CalPAP materials for July 1.8 8/22/11 8/23/11 .4 Correspondence: Bien, Morrison, Campbell, Jacob; review materials; telephone w/Defendants .9 Correspondence: Christian, Jacob, Roudebush; review Plaintiff report re: Placer County Jail monitoring .7 8/25/11 Correspondence: Blake, Riley, Huey; review materials .6 8/26/11 Correspondence: Hennessey, Campbell, Morrison, Rice, Bien, Prewitt, Jacob, Ruslani; review Plaintiff Region II report and CalPAP report; and materials 1.0 Correspondence: Morrison, Campbell, Stilber, Jacob, Fischer, Bien, Court; telephone: Court, Defendants; review materials 1.3 Correspondence: Morrison, Carvo, Jacob, Campbell; telephone: Bien, Jacob; review materials 1.2 8/24/11 8/29/11 8/30/11 8/31/11 Correspondence: Campbell; prepare OSM billing for August; review materials 1.8 29.0 * 0 Hrs. @ $ 90/hr. = $ -0- and 29 hrs. @ $200/hr. = $ 5,800 = $ 5,800.00 * travel time @ $90/hr. Expenses for August 2 -$0Total Fees and Expenses: $+ $ -0- = $ Valdivia et al. v. Brown et al., No. CIV S-94-671 LKK/GGH Collaboration Specialists Services rendered by Virginia Morrison Tax #: 51-0433003 Fees for August 2011 Date_________________Activity_________________________________Time/Hours 8/1/11 Review and respond to email communication; telephone conference w/plaintiffs 0.2 8/1/11 Travel from San Anselmo to Los Angeles for LACJ visit 5.5* 8/2/11 Review email communication; observe parolee interviews at LACJ 4.1 8/3/11 Telephone conferences w/defendants and plaintiffs re: monitoring; review email communication 0.3 8/4/11 Observe proceedings at LACJ 5.5 8/4/11 Travel within Los Angeles and from Los Angeles to San Anselmo 6.8* 8/6/11 Review documents 0.3 8/8/11 Review and respond to email communication; telephone conference w/defendants re: mentally ill parolees; observe task force meeting and write related notes; analyze RSTS records 0.9 8/10/11 Telephone conference w/defendants and OSM 0.7 8/11/11 Telephone conference w/defendants re: RSTS; review email communication 0.25 8/12/11 Review email communication 0.1 8/15/11 Telephone conference w/C. Riveland; review and analyze RSTS and related documents; email communication w/defendants 1.8 8/16/11 Telephone conferences w/defendants and plaintiffs; review and respond to email communication; review and analyze RSTS material 1.5 8/17/11 Telephone conferences w/defendants re: RSTS and regulations; email communication w/OSM team; review documents 2.3 8/18/11 Review and analyze documents; email communication w/defendants 4.75 8/19/11 Review and analyze documents; email communication w/defendants 3.0 8/22/11 Review and respond to email communication; review and analyze documents; telephone conference w/defendants re: RSTS 2.4 8/23/11 Review and respond to email communication; telephone conferences w/defendants and CalPAP re: data; review and analyze documents 6.3 8/24/11 Review and analyze documents; telephone conference w/defendants re: data 3.3 8/25/11 Telephone conference w/N. Campbell; review and analyze documents 0.6 8/26/11 Review and respond to email communication; review documents 0.4 8/29/11 Review and analyze documents 2.75 Total…………………………………………………………………………….. 41.45 X $200/hour = $ 8,290 12.3 X $ 90/hour = $ 1,107 $ 9,397 * denotes travel time at lower rate Disbursements/Expenses for August 2011 Date Amount Activity 8/1/11 Airfare for Los Angeles site visit 8/4/11 Airport parking for Los Angeles site visit 8/4/11 Rental car and gas for Los Angeles site visit 194.86 8/4/11 Hotel during Los Angeles site visit 323.24 8/4/11 Mileage and tolls between San Anselmo and San Francisco Airport (64 miles at 51 cents per mile) 38.64 8/4/11 Parking during Los Angeles site visit 22.00 8/4/11 Meals during Los Angeles site visit 127.63 Total…………………………………….…………………..………………$ Total Fees and Expenses: $ 10,305.75 159.40 42.98 908.75 Valdivia et al. v. Brown et. al., No. CIV S-94-671 LKK/GGH For: Nancy Campbell Tax #: 060-40-9849 Fees for August 2011 Date 8/4/11 Activity Time/Hours 8/29/11 Review Ds DEC and Release Memos; Review corr re: 1.25 realignment; review AB 109 document; P27 responses Monthly Ds Call; Review DEC training; Review Draft 1.50 regs, Hearing Directive and Ds corr re: realignment Review Ps response to Ds SC report; Review Ds RSTS report; 2.00 Review monitoring reports and revised hearing directive and regs Review realignment corr and policies; Review RSTS report .50 Total …………………………………………………………………….. 5.25 8/10/11 8/16/11 5.25 X $180/hour= $945.00 Total Fees 945.00

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?