Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 1736

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/10/2012, Confirming undisputed attorneys' fees and costs for third quarter 2011. WHEREFORE, IT IS CONFIRMED 1734 that $593,156.74 plus interest accruing at the rate provided by 28:1961 is due and collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. 1087 (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 GEOFFREY THOMAS HOLTZ – 191370 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 2 Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 3 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 4 DONALD SPECTER – 83925 5 PRISON LAW OFFICE 1917 Fifth Street 6 Berkeley, California 94710-1916 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 7 Facsimile: (510) 280-2704 8 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 96891 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 9 SHIRLEY HUEY – 224114 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP 10 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 11 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 17 18 JERRY VALDIVIA, et al., Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011 21 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants.1 22 Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The names of Defendants currently serving and their official capacities have been substituted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25. [580821-1] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011 1 On July 8, 2004, this Court established procedures by which plaintiffs are to collect 2 periodic attorneys’ fees and costs in this case in connection with their work monitoring 3 defendants’ compliance with the Court’s Orders and collecting fees. 4 Pursuant to these procedures, plaintiffs sent their Quarterly Statement for the Third 5 Quarter of 2011, covering the period of July 1, 2011 – September 30, 2011 to defendants 6 via overnight Federal Express on October 27, 2011. Defendants submitted their objections 7 to plaintiffs’ statement on December 6, 2011. The parties completed their meet and confer 8 on December 19, 2011, and reached an agreement as to most of the hours and all of the 9 costs incurred in this quarter. 10 Pursuant to the July 8, 2004 Order, ¶ 4, the parties will defer and hold in abeyance 11 the dispute over the remaining hours that are not settled through this Stipulation (a total of 12 $91,797 in fees that Defendants have objected to as related to the pending Proposition 9 13 motions) until they are settled or a yearly motion to compel payment is brought following 14 the meet and confer covering the fourth quarter of 2011. 15 / / / 16 / / / 17 / / / 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / [580821-1] 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011 1 The parties agree that $593,156.74 of fees and costs incurred during the Third 2 Quarter of 2011 are undisputed. (A summary of the fees and costs, reflecting the fees at 3 2011 rates, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.) WHEREFORE, IT IS CONFIRMED that 4 $593,156.74 plus interest accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 is due and 5 collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 8 DATED: January 3, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 9 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP 10 By: /s/ Ernest Galvan Ernest Galvan 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 DATED: January 3, 2012 HANSON BRIDGETT, LLP 15 By: /s/ Samantha Wolff Samantha Wolff 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: January 10, 2012 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [580821-1] 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?