Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
1736
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/10/2012, Confirming undisputed attorneys' fees and costs for third quarter 2011. WHEREFORE, IT IS CONFIRMED 1734 that $593,156.74 plus interest accruing at the rate provided by 28:1961 is due and collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. 1087 (Reader, L)
1 GEOFFREY THOMAS HOLTZ – 191370
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
2 Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111-4067
3 Telephone: (415) 393-2000
Facsimile: (415) 393-2286
4
DONALD SPECTER – 83925
5 PRISON LAW OFFICE
1917 Fifth Street
6 Berkeley, California 94710-1916
Telephone: (510) 280-2621
7 Facsimile: (510) 280-2704
8 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 96891
ERNEST GALVAN – 196065
9 SHIRLEY HUEY – 224114
ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP
10 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, California 94104-1823
11 Telephone: (415) 433-6830
Facsimile: (415) 433-7104
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
17
18 JERRY VALDIVIA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011
21 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
Defendants.1
22
Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The names of Defendants currently serving and their official capacities have been
substituted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25.
[580821-1]
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011
1
On July 8, 2004, this Court established procedures by which plaintiffs are to collect
2 periodic attorneys’ fees and costs in this case in connection with their work monitoring
3 defendants’ compliance with the Court’s Orders and collecting fees.
4
Pursuant to these procedures, plaintiffs sent their Quarterly Statement for the Third
5 Quarter of 2011, covering the period of July 1, 2011 – September 30, 2011 to defendants
6 via overnight Federal Express on October 27, 2011. Defendants submitted their objections
7 to plaintiffs’ statement on December 6, 2011. The parties completed their meet and confer
8 on December 19, 2011, and reached an agreement as to most of the hours and all of the
9 costs incurred in this quarter.
10
Pursuant to the July 8, 2004 Order, ¶ 4, the parties will defer and hold in abeyance
11 the dispute over the remaining hours that are not settled through this Stipulation (a total of
12 $91,797 in fees that Defendants have objected to as related to the pending Proposition 9
13 motions) until they are settled or a yearly motion to compel payment is brought following
14 the meet and confer covering the fourth quarter of 2011.
15 / / /
16 / / /
17 / / /
18 / / /
19 / / /
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
[580821-1]
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011
1
The parties agree that $593,156.74 of fees and costs incurred during the Third
2 Quarter of 2011 are undisputed. (A summary of the fees and costs, reflecting the fees at
3 2011 rates, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.) WHEREFORE, IT IS CONFIRMED that
4 $593,156.74 plus interest accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 is due and
5 collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order.
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
8 DATED: January 3, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
9
ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP
10
By: /s/ Ernest Galvan
Ernest Galvan
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14 DATED: January 3, 2012
HANSON BRIDGETT, LLP
15
By: /s/ Samantha Wolff
Samantha Wolff
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: January 10, 2012
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[580821-1]
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?