Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 1761

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/21/2012. Court is ADOPTING its Findings and Recommendations in full. The substantial compliance finding applies to all locations except Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and California Institution for Men, they remain subject to monitoring this requirement. Defendants SHALL report status of these requirements to all parties every 6 months beginning on 7/8/2012. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 JERRY VALDIVIA, ALFRED YANCY, and HOSSIE WELCH, on their own behalf and on behalf of the class of all persons similarly situated, NO. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. O R D E R 14 15 16 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor of the State of California, et al., Defendants. / 17 18 The court is in receipt of the Eleventh Report of the 19 Special Master, ECF No. 1730, filed on December 15, 2011. No 20 objections were filed. Due to court error, the Eleventh Report 21 has not yet been adopted by the court. The court has considered 22 the report and ADOPTS its findings and recommendations in full. 23 Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 24 [1] The following requirements are substantially 25 compliant, and the subjects will therefore no longer 26 be a primary focus of Plaintiffs’ or the Special 1 1 Master’s monitoring unless they are inextricably 2 linked with review of the hearing process or the 3 remedial sanctions obligations of the Permanent 4 Injunction, or arise in the course of investigating an 5 individual parolee’s situation. These items will 6 remain in this status unless and until it comes to the 7 parties’ or the Special Master’s attention that there 8 has been a significant decline in compliance. These 9 orders should apply to the following requirements: 10 a) On or before the fourth business day [after 11 notice of charges is served] the Unit Supervisor 12 must review the report and (1) determine if there 13 is sufficient basis for the revocation to go 14 forward; (2) determine if the report is accurate, 15 complete, and contains the correct Title 15 16 violation sections; and (3) consider whether 17 remedial sanctions/community based treatment is 18 appropriate (Remedial Plan at 3) 19 b) On or before the fifth business day [after 20 notice of charges is served], the revocation 21 packet is forwarded to the decentralized 22 revocation unit where the parolee is being held. 23 (Remedial Plan at 4) 24 c) Defendants shall appoint counsel for all 25 parolees beginning at the Return to Custody 26 Assessment stage of the revocation proceeding. 2 1 (Injunction ¶11(b)(i)) 2 The substantial compliance finding applies to all 3 locations except Richard J. Donovan Correctional 4 Facility and California Institution for Men; they will 5 remain subject to monitoring on this requirement. 6 [2] Defendants SHALL report the status of these 7 requirements to all parties every six months, 8 beginning on July 8, 2012. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 21, 2012. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?