Espinoza v. Ornoski
Filing
238
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/15/11 ORDERING that within twenty days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a brief onthe impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, on these proceedings and, in particular, on petitioners motion for evidentiary hearing. Within twenty days after petitioner files his brief, respondent shall file a responsive brief. Within ten days thereafter, petitioner may file a reply.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANTONIO ESPINOZA,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. CIV S-94-1665 LKK DAD
vs.
DEATH PENALTY CASE
WARDEN, San Quentin
State Prison,
14
Respondent.
ORDER
15
/
16
17
Within twenty days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a brief on
18
the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, No. 09-1088, 2011 WL 1225705 (U.S. Apr. 4, 2011) on these
19
proceedings and, in particular, on petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing. Within twenty
20
days after petitioner files his brief, respondent shall file a responsive brief. Within ten days
21
thereafter, petitioner may file a reply.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
DATED: April 15, 2011.
24
25
26
espinoza pin.or
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?