Espinoza v. Ornoski

Filing 238

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/15/11 ORDERING that within twenty days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a brief onthe impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, on these proceedings and, in particular, on petitioners motion for evidentiary hearing. Within twenty days after petitioner files his brief, respondent shall file a responsive brief. Within ten days thereafter, petitioner may file a reply.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO ESPINOZA, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. CIV S-94-1665 LKK DAD vs. DEATH PENALTY CASE WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, 14 Respondent. ORDER 15 / 16 17 Within twenty days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a brief on 18 the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, No. 09-1088, 2011 WL 1225705 (U.S. Apr. 4, 2011) on these 19 proceedings and, in particular, on petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing. Within twenty 20 days after petitioner files his brief, respondent shall file a responsive brief. Within ten days 21 thereafter, petitioner may file a reply. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: April 15, 2011. 24 25 26 espinoza pin.or 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?