Stanley v. Calderon
Filing
952
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/4/2014 ORDERING that within 5 days, petitioner shall file a statement explaining which portions of the state court record he lacks; within 20 days thereafter, respondent shall file a notice that he has lodged those portions of the record with the court or explain why he was unable to do so.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JERRY F. STANLEY,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:95-CV-1500 JAM CKD
DEATH PENALTY CASE
v.
WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner seeks respondent’s compliance with Local Rule 191(h)(1) to obtain the record
17
18
of the state court’s retrospective competency proceedings. (ECF No. 946.) Respondent’s counsel
19
asserts Rule 191(h)(1) is not applicable in this situation. (ECF No. 951.) However, respondent
20
notes that this court has authority to order him “to file the court documents related to the 2011
21
competency proceedings in Lake County Superior Court.” (Id. at 3.) This order requires
22
respondent to do so.
23
Within five days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a statement explaining
24
which portions of the state court record he lacks. Within twenty days thereafter, respondent shall
25
file a notice that he has lodged those portions of the record with the court or explain why he was
26
unable to do so.
27
////
28
////
1
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 4, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
4
5
6
7
Stanley comp pro record.or2
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?