Stanley v. Calderon

Filing 952

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/4/2014 ORDERING that within 5 days, petitioner shall file a statement explaining which portions of the state court record he lacks; within 20 days thereafter, respondent shall file a notice that he has lodged those portions of the record with the court or explain why he was unable to do so.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERRY F. STANLEY, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:95-CV-1500 JAM CKD DEATH PENALTY CASE v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 Petitioner seeks respondent’s compliance with Local Rule 191(h)(1) to obtain the record 17 18 of the state court’s retrospective competency proceedings. (ECF No. 946.) Respondent’s counsel 19 asserts Rule 191(h)(1) is not applicable in this situation. (ECF No. 951.) However, respondent 20 notes that this court has authority to order him “to file the court documents related to the 2011 21 competency proceedings in Lake County Superior Court.” (Id. at 3.) This order requires 22 respondent to do so. 23 Within five days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a statement explaining 24 which portions of the state court record he lacks. Within twenty days thereafter, respondent shall 25 file a notice that he has lodged those portions of the record with the court or explain why he was 26 unable to do so. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 Stanley comp pro record.or2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?