Thompson, et al v. Wilson, et al

Filing 103

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/20/09 ORDERING that the 102 findings and recommendations filed November 19, 2008, are adopted in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. GRAY DAVIS, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiffs are two state prisoners proceeding pro se with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On November 19, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff Thompson's copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff Thompson was properly served. It is the plaintiff's /// 1 ORDER CHARLES THOMPSON, et al., Plaintiffs, 2:96-cv-0297-GEB-DAD-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 19, 2008, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); Local Rules 83-182(f) and 11-110. Dated: January 20, 2009 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?