Hawkins v. Wong

Filing 234

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/27/11 ORDERING that by 6/14/11, each party shall file a brief on the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, on petitioners motion for an evidentiary hearing and the findings and recommendations issued thereon, including particularly (but without limitation), Claims A, B, P, R, and W.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY JAY HAWKINS, Petitioner, 11 12 13 14 vs. ROBERT K. WONG, Warden, DEATH PENALTY CASE Respondent. ORDER / 15 16 No. CIV S-96-1155 MCE EFB By June 14, 2011, each party shall file a brief on the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, No. 17 09-1088, 2011 WL 1225705 (U.S. Apr. 4, 2011) on petitioner’s motion for an evidentiary 18 hearing and the findings and recommendations issued thereon, including particularly (but 19 without limitation), Claims A, B, P, R, and W. 20 DATED: May 27, 2011. 21 22 23 24 25 26

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?