Proctor v. Wong, et al

Filing 350

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/5/2021 ORDERING Petitioner's supplemental merits brief on Claims W, Y, CC, EE, and NN and Petitioner's merits brief on Claim P, U, AA, GG, HH, II, and JJ are due by 7/22/2022, Respondents' response brief is due within 300 days of the date of filing of Petitioner's brief(s), and Petitioner's reply brief is due within 150 days of the date of filing of Respondents' brief.(Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM A. PROCTOR, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 v. No. 2:96-CV-1401-JAM-DMC DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER RON BROOMFIELD1, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, brings this petition 17 18 for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is the parties’ 19 stipulated schedule for briefing of the merits of the remaining claims in this case. See ECF No. 20 349. Good cause appearing therefor, the parties’ stipulated schedule is approved as follows: Petitioner’s supplemental merits brief on Claims W, Y, CC, EE, and NN is due by July 22, 2022. 21 22 Petitioner’s merits brief on Claim P, U, AA, GG, HH, II, and JJ is due by July 22, 2022. 23 Respondents’ response brief is due within 300 days of the date of filing of Petitioner’s brief(s). 24 25 26 27 28 /// 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Ron Broomfield is substituted for his predecessor. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket to reflect the above caption. 1 1 Petitioner’s reply brief is due within 150 days of the date of filing of Respondents’ brief. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: October 5, 2021 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?