Hines v. Ylst

Filing 362

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/27/19 GRANTING 361 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner to file and serve his response to 351 Motion for Summary Adjudication by and including 10/30/2019. Respondent's reply, if any, to be filed on or before 12/14/2019. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 GARY DALE HINES, 13 Petitioner, 14 vs. 15 16 MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, 17 Respondent. 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:98-cv-0784-TLN-EFB DP DEATH PENALTY CASE [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Petitioner, by his counsel, has submitted a third unopposed motion for an 20 extension of time to file his response to Respondent’s Motion for Summary Adjudication 21 22 filed on January 29, 2019, from July 2, 2019 to October 30, 2019. 23 Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that: 24 1. Petitioner’s unopposed motion to file and serve his response to 25 26 Respondents’ Motion for Summary Adjudication is granted to and including October 30, 27 2019. 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:98-cv-0784-TLN-EFB DP 1 2. Respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed on or before December 14, 2019 2 or 45 days from the date Petitioner’s Response is filed. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 27, 2019. 6 _______________________________________ EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:98-cv-0784-TLN-EFB DP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?