Hines v. Ylst
Filing
362
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/27/19 GRANTING 361 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner to file and serve his response to 351 Motion for Summary Adjudication by and including 10/30/2019. Respondent's reply, if any, to be filed on or before 12/14/2019. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
GARY DALE HINES,
13
Petitioner,
14
vs.
15
16
MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden of the
California State Prison at San Quentin,
17
Respondent.
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:98-cv-0784-TLN-EFB DP
DEATH PENALTY CASE
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME
Petitioner, by his counsel, has submitted a third unopposed motion for an
20
extension of time to file his response to Respondent’s Motion for Summary Adjudication
21
22
filed on January 29, 2019, from July 2, 2019 to October 30, 2019.
23
Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that:
24
1.
Petitioner’s unopposed motion to file and serve his response to
25
26
Respondents’ Motion for Summary Adjudication is granted to and including October 30,
27
2019.
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 2:98-cv-0784-TLN-EFB DP
1
2.
Respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed on or before December 14, 2019
2
or 45 days from the date Petitioner’s Response is filed.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 27, 2019.
6
_______________________________________
EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 2:98-cv-0784-TLN-EFB DP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?