Lopez v. Peterson, et al

Filing 390

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/21/14 ORDERING that 382 motion for a seven-day extension to serve their responses to Plaintiffs first set of interrogatories and admission and production requests is granted, nunc pro tunc.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
ANDREW R. LOPEZ,

No. 2:98-cv-2111 LKK-EFB (PC)

12
13
v.
14
15

Plaintiff, [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING SEVENDAY EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANTS
DIGGS AND HAAS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF
DISCOVERY

D. PETERSON, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

Good cause appearing, Defendants’ motion for a seven-day extension to serve their

19

responses to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and admission and production requests is

20

granted, nunc pro tunc.

21

Defendants shall respond to the first set of written discovery on or before April 9, 2014.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated: April 21, 2014.

24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Defendants Seven-Day Extension to Respond to Plaintiff’s Discovery (2:98-cv-2111 LKK-EFB)