Lopez v. Peterson, et al
Filing
403
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/8/14 ORDERING that Robert Navarro is appointed as limited purpose counsel in the above entitled matter. This appointment is for the limited purpose of conducting discovery only. Robert Navarros appointment will terminate when all discovery matters are closed in this action. The court will notify the parties when discovery is closed.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ANDREW RICK LOPEZ,
11
12
13
No. 2:98-cv-2111-LKK-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER APPOINTING LIMITED PURPOSE
COUNSEL
D. PETERSON, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action brought
17
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court finds that the appointment of counsel is warranted for the
18
limited purpose of conducting discovery. Robert Navarro has been selected from the court’s pro
19
bono attorney panel to represent plaintiff for this limited purpose, and he has agreed to be
20
appointed.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Robert Navarro is appointed as limited purpose counsel in the above entitled matter. This
appointment is for the limited purpose of conducting discovery only.
2. Robert Navarro’s appointment will terminate when all discovery matters are closed in this
action. The court will notify the parties when discovery is closed.
3. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park at (916) 930-4278, or via email at
spark@caed.uscourts.gov if he has any questions related to the appointment.
1
1
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Robert Navarro,
2
Attorney at Law, 1295 North Wishon Avenue, Suite 3, Fresno, California 93728.
3
DATED: July 8, 2014.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?