Lopez v. Peterson, et al

Filing 447

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/22/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's 439 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANDREW RICK LOPEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:98-cv-2111-MCE-EFB P

v.

ORDER

D. PETERSON, et. al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff filed a “Request for Court to Lift Dispositive Motion Deadline.” ECF No. 435.

17
18

On November 10, 2015, the magistrate judge issued an order denying Plaintiff’s Motion. ECF

19

No. 436. On November 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order. ECF

20

No. 439. The Court construes Plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration.
Pursuant to Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

21
22

erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that the

23

magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the order of the magistrate judge filed November

2

10, 2015(ECF No. 436) is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s objections to the magistrate judge’s order

3

(ECF No. 439) is construed as a motion for reconsideration and DENIED.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 22, 2015

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2