Mendoza v. Beard

Filing 81

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/6/19 ADOPTING 79 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus 24 is DENIED. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS MENDOZA, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:98-cv-02150 MCE GGH P v. ORDER JEFFREY BEARD, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this application for a writ 17 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 20, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Petitioner has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 20, 2019, (ECF No. 79) are 3 ADOPTED in full; 4 2. Petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 24) is DENIED; and 5 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 6 7 8 2253. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 6, 2019 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?