McKinney, et al v. CA Dept Corrections, et al

Filing 165

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 7/2/19 ADOPTING in full 163 findings and recommendations. Plaintiff's 162 motion for relief from judgment is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALONZO McKINNEY,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:99-cv-0622-MCE-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

19

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

20

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On May 22, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

22

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

23

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed

24

objections to the findings and recommendations.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

26

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

27

file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

28

proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 22, 2019, (ECF No. 163) are ADOPTED

3

in full; and

4

2. Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 162) is DENIED.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: July 2, 2019

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2