Arias v. Calderon, et al
Filing
215
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/15/11 ordering by 09/19/11, petitioner shall file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster her. Within another 30 days, respondent will submit a responsive pleading addressing the impace of Pinholster here and petitioner may submit any reply within 14 days thereafter. The status conference set for 11/10/11 at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
PEDRO ARIAS,
10
Petitioner,
11
v.
12
13
14
VINCE CULLEN, Warden,
San Quentin State Prison,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. CIV.S-99-0627 WBS DAD DP
CAPITAL CASE
ORDER
15
16
Petitioner has filed an unopposed request to modify the briefing schedule and extend by 4
17
days the time in which to prepare and file the traverse, from September 15, 2011, to September
18
19, 2011, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S.
19
1388 (2011) on this matter.
, 131 S. Ct.
20
Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that:
21
By September 19, 2011, petitioner shall file the reply or traverse or other appropriate
22
pleading, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster here. Within another thirty
23
days, respondent will submit a responsive pleading addressing the impact of Pinholster here and
24
petitioner may submit any reply within fourteen days thereafter. The status conference set for
25
November 10, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled.
26
DATED: September 15, 2011.
27
dad1
2 8 capital.arias0627.ord.modifybrfsched3
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?