Arias v. Calderon, et al

Filing 217

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/20/11 ORDERING that by 9/22/11, petitioner shall file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster here. Within another 30 days, respondent shall submit a responsive pleading addressing the impact of Pinholster here and petitioner may submit any reply within ten days thereafter. The status conference set for 11/10/11, at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

PEDRO ARIAS,

10

Petitioner,

11
12

v.
VINCE CULLEN, Warden,
San Quentin State Prison,

13
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. CIV.S-99-0627 WBS DAD DP
CAPITAL CASE
ORDER

14
15
Petitioner has filed an unopposed request to modify the briefing schedule and extend by 3
16
days the time in which to prepare and file the traverse, from September 19, 2011, to September
17
22, 2011, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S.

, 131 S. Ct.

18
1388 (2011) on this matter.
19
Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that:
20
By September 22, 2011, petitioner shall file the reply or traverse or other appropriate
21
pleading, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster here. Within another thirty
22
days, respondent will submit a responsive pleading addressing the impact of Pinholster here and
23
petitioner may submit any reply within ten days thereafter. The status conference set for
24
November 10, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled.
25
DATED: September 20, 2011.
26
2 7 dad1:capital
arias0627.ord.modifybrfsched4
28
1