Ameripride Svc Inc v. Valley Industrial, et al
Filing
641
[DISREGARD- DUPLICATE of 640 Order ] ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 07/06/07 ORDERING that page 8, line 10 of the Court's 07/02/07 order 638 is hereby AMENDED so that the word "without" is replaced with the word "with". (Manzer, C) Modified on 7/6/2007 (Donati, J).
<![CDATA[
Ameripride Svc Inc v. Valley Industrial, et al
Doc. 641
Case 2:00-cv-00113-LKK-JFM
Document 641
Filed 07/06/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES, INC., A Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC., a former California corporation, et al., Defendants. AND CONSOLIDATED ACTION AND CROSS- AND COUNTER-CLAIMS. / / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NO. CIV. S-00-113 LKK/JFM ORDER
The court is in receipt of Mission Linen's July 2, 2007 letter. The letter identifies an error in the proposed order The proposed order
entering judgment in the above captioned case.
was formally issued by the court on July 2, 2007, prior to the court having received Mission Linen's letter. The letter identifies a section of the order that is an error. 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:00-cv-00113-LKK-JFM
Document 641
Filed 07/06/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Specifically, the order, in pertinent part, reads, "and with the exception of cross-claims against Mission Linen, which are
dismissed without prejudice with each party agreement to bear its own costs and fees." Order at 8:9-11. As Mission Linen properly
points out, the court granted Mission Linen's Motions for Summary Judgment on February 28, 2007. In the same order, the court denied AmeriPride's Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons
explained in that order, the cross-claims involving Mission Linen were clearly dismissed with prejudice. order should reflect as much. as follows: 1. Page 8, line 10, of the court's July 2, 2007 order is hereby AMENDED so that the word "without" is replaced with the word "with." IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 6, 2007. Accordingly, the proposed
For these reasons, the court orders
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
