Ameripride Svc Inc v. Valley Industrial, et al
Filing
978
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/17/2013 APPROVING 977 Stipulation and Proposed Order for Substitution of Counsel; RELIEVING the law firm of Foley & Lardner of all further responsibility for the representation of Defendant Huhtamaki Foodservice, Inc.; ORDERING that all further pleadings, correspondence and other documents in this matter be directed to Stephen J. Darmody, Esq., Darmody & Carta P.A. (Michel, G)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
Ameripride Services, Inc., a
Delaware corporation,
6
7
8
9
Case No: CIV. SS-00-113 LKK/JFM
Plaintiff,
vs.
Valley Industrial Services,
Inc., a former California
corporation and Texas Eastern
Overseas, Inc., a former
Delaware corporation,
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR
DEFENDANT, HUHTAMAKI
FOODSERVICE INC.
Defendants.
10
11
12
13
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Stipulation for
Substitution of Counsel for Defendant, Huhtamaki Foodservice,
14
Inc. (“Huhtamaki”), and the Court having reviewed the
15
Stipulation, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
16
17
1.
The Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel is hereby
approved.
2.
The law firm of Foley & Lardner LLP is hereby relieved
18
of all further responsibility for the representation Huhtamaki
19
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
20
21
CASE NO. 8:13-CV-664 CJC-FFMX
1
in
2
3
the
above-captioned
correspondence
and
other
matter.
documents
All
in
further
this
matter
pleadings,
shall
be
directed to: Stephen J. Darmody, Esq., Darmody & Carta P.A., 201
Sevilla Avenue, Suite 305, Coral Gables, Florida 33134, Tel:
4
5
6
(305) 442-7737; Fax: (305) 397-1285.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: September 17, 2013.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2
20
21
STIPULATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?