Hebbe v. Pliler, et al
Filing
254
STIPULATION and ORDER 253 signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/16/13 ORDERING this action DISMISSED with prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER, State Bar No. 230529
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
DIANA ESQUIVEL, State Bar No. 202954
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 445-4928
Facsimile: (916) 324-5205
E-mail: Diana.Esquivel@doj.ca.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendants Pliler and Vance
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
PAUL ERIC HEBBE,
No. 2:00-cv-00306 EFB
14
15
v.
16
17
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND
PROPOSED ORDER
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
PLILER, et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Paul E. Hebbe and
22
Defendants Pliler and Vance stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (2:00-cv-00306 EFB)
1
2
3
Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, or expenses. There is no prevailing party in this
action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
5
Dated: October 15, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
6
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
7
8
9
___/s/ Diana Esquivel_________
Diana Esquivel
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
10
11
12
Dated: October 15, 2013
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
13
___/s/ Robert D. Hunt_________
David Almeling
Robert D. Hunt
Attorneys for Plaintiff
14
15
16
17
18
ORDER
19
Based on the parties’ stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: October 16, 2013.
23
24
25
26
CA2001CX0034
31796302.doc
27
28
2
Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (2:00-cv-00306 EFB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?