Hebbe v. Pliler, et al

Filing 254

STIPULATION and ORDER 253 signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/16/13 ORDERING this action DISMISSED with prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER, State Bar No. 230529 Supervising Deputy Attorney General DIANA ESQUIVEL, State Bar No. 202954 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 445-4928 Facsimile: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Diana.Esquivel@doj.ca.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendants Pliler and Vance 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 PAUL ERIC HEBBE, No. 2:00-cv-00306 EFB 14 15 v. 16 17 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND PROPOSED ORDER [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] PLILER, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Paul E. Hebbe and 22 Defendants Pliler and Vance stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (2:00-cv-00306 EFB) 1 2 3 Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, or expenses. There is no prevailing party in this action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 5 Dated: October 15, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 6 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER Supervising Deputy Attorney General 7 8 9 ___/s/ Diana Esquivel_________ Diana Esquivel Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 10 11 12 Dated: October 15, 2013 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 13 ___/s/ Robert D. Hunt_________ David Almeling Robert D. Hunt Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 15 16 17 18 ORDER 19 Based on the parties’ stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: October 16, 2013. 23 24 25 26 CA2001CX0034 31796302.doc 27 28 2 Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (2:00-cv-00306 EFB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?