Cohea v. Pliler, et al

Filing 212

ORDER and RAND Notice signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/31/12 ORDERING that 201 and 205 Motions for Summary Judgment and to have plaintiff declared a vexatious litigant are DENIED without prejudice; Within 30 days of the date of this order, defendants may re-file and re-serve the March 28, 2011 motions for summary judgment and to have plaintiff declared a vexatious litigant. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DANNY JAMES COHEA,
Plaintiff,

11

No. 2:00-cv-02799 GEB EFB P

vs.

12
13

CHERYL K. PLILER, WARDEN, et al.,

14

Defendants.

ORDER
/

15

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

16
17

U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court are defendants’ March 28, 2011 motions for

18

summary judgment and to have plaintiff declared a vexatious litigant, which the parties have

19

fully briefed and is now submitted for decision. However, in light of recent Ninth Circuit case

20

law and to ensure that plaintiff has “fair, timely and adequate notice” of what is required of him

21

to oppose defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and because resolution of the vexatious

22

litigant motion is intertwined with resolution of the summary judgment motion, the court must

23

deny both motions without prejudice to their re-filing, and to concurrently serving plaintiff with

24

notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. See Woods v. Carey,

25

___ F.3d ___, Nos. 09-15548, 09-16113, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13779 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012)

26

////
1

1

(“The only satisfactory practice to ensure that prisoners receive adequate notice pursuant to Rand

2

and Wyatt is to provide such notice at the time that the relevant motions are filed.” (emphasis

3

added)); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 960 (1998) (en banc) (requiring that the notice state

4

that the court has required that it be given and that it be set forth in a separate document that is

5

served with the moving papers).

6

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

7

1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and to have plaintiff declared a vexatious

8
9

litigant (Dckt. Nos. 201, 205) are denied without prejudice.
2. Within thirty days of the date of this order, defendants may re-file and re-serve the

10

March 28, 2011 motions for summary judgment and to have plaintiff declared a vexatious

11

litigant. Defendants must contemporaneously serve with the motion, but in a separate document,

12

a copy of the attached “Rand Notice,”which provides plaintiff with notice of the requirements for

13

opposing a motion for summary judgment. Failure to do so may constitute grounds for denial

14

of the motion.

15

3. If defendants re-serve their motions, plaintiff may thereafter file and serve amended

16

oppositions within thirty days. If plaintiff fails to file amended oppositions, the court will

17

consider his existing oppositions in resolving defendants’ motions.

18

4. If plaintiff files amended oppositions, defendants may thereafter file amended replies

19

within fourteen days.

20

DATED: July 31, 2012.

21
22
23
24
25
26
2

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
DANNY JAMES COHEA,
4
Plaintiff,

No. 2:00-cv-02799 GEB EFB P

5
vs.
6
CHERYL K. PLILER, WARDEN, et al.,
7

RAND NOTICE*

Defendants.
8
/
9
10
11
12
13

The court requires that you be provided with this notice regarding the requirements for
opposing a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
When a defendant moves for summary judgment, the defendant is requesting that the
court grant judgment in defendant’s favor without a trial. If there is no real dispute about any
fact that would affect the result of your case, the defendant who asked for summary judgment is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case against that defendant. A
motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant asserts are not
reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

To oppose a motion for summary judgment, you must show proof of your claims. To do
this, you may refer to specific statements made in your complaint if you signed your complaint
under penalty of perjury and if your complaint shows that you have personal knowledge of the
matters stated. You may also submit declarations setting forth the facts that you believe prove
your claims, as long as the person who signs the declaration has personal knowledge of the facts
stated. You may also submit all or part of deposition transcripts, answers to interrogatories,
admissions, and other authenticated documents. For each of the facts listed in the defendant’s
Statement of Undisputed Facts, you must admit the facts that are undisputed, and deny the facts
that are disputed. If you deny a fact, you must cite to the proof that you rely on to support your
denial. See L.R. 260(b). If you fail to contradict the defendant’s evidence with your own
evidence, the court may accept the defendant’s evidence as the truth and grant the motion. The
court will consider a request to postpone consideration of the defendant’s motion if you submit a
declaration showing that for a specific reason you cannot present such facts in your opposition.
If you do not respond to the motion, the court may consider your failure to act as a waiver of
your opposition. See L.R. 230(l).

22
23

If the court grants the defendant’s motion, whether opposed or unopposed, judgment will
be entered for that defendant without a trial and the case will be closed as to that defendant.

24
*

25
26

This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely
and adequate notice of what is required” to oppose a motion for summary judgment. See Woods
v. Carey, __ F.3d __, Nos. 09-15548, 09-16113, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13779, at *1 (9th Cir.
July 6, 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998)
3