Cohea v. Pliler, et al
Filing
261
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/24/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 254 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 252 Motion for Order on Obstruction of Justice. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANNY JAMES COHEA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:00-cv-2799-GEB-EFB P
v.
ORDER
CHERYL K. PLILER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 18, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
26
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
27
proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 18, 2015, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff's “request for order on obstruction of justice related to obstruction of court
4
5
6
order(s)” (ECF No. 252) is denied without prejudice.
So ordered.
Dated: April 24, 2015
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?