Riel v. Woodford

Filing 416

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/22/10. The court approves the methods for recording lay witness testimony set out in the parties' 6/1/10 Stipulation.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

(HC) (DP) Riel v. Woodford

Doc. 416

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Respondent. 15 / 16 As set out in the court's June 30 order, the parties may begin taking the testimony 17 depositions of lay witnesses. There is an outstanding issue of the method or methods for 18 recording each of these depositions. Neither party appears to object to the court issuing a ruling 19 on the methods of recording. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 20 1. The court approves the methods for recording lay witness testimony set out in 21 the parties' June 1, 2010 Stipulation. 22 2. There is currently no deadline for conducting the lay witness testimony 23 depositions. See June 23, 2010 Order at 2. As set forth in the June 23 order, a new schedule for 24 the taking of in-court and out-of-court testimony will be set later. In the meantime, the parties 25 may agree to conduct lay witness testimony depositions. If, as indicated in petitioner's July 6, 26 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES D. RIEL, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, ORDER No. CIV S-01-0507 LKK KJM DEATH PENALTY CASE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2010 Statement, it is necessary to conduct some depositions soon and if the parties are unable to agree to a date for doing so, petitioner may request court intervention to determine an appropriate deposition date. DATED: July 22, 2010.

riel lay w testi.or

2