Riel v. Woodford

Filing 501

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/07/11 granting 497 Motion for continuance of hearing. The October 7th hearing is continued to 10:00 a.m on 11/16/11. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROBERT D. BACON, CA SB #73297 484 Lake Park Avenue, PMB 110 Oakland, California 94610 (510) 834-6219; FAX (510) 444-6861 E-mail: bacon2254@aol.com DANIEL J. BRODERICK, CA SB #89424 Federal Defender JOAN M. FISHER, ID SB #2854 Assistant Federal Defender TIVON SCHARDL FL SB#0073016 Trial and Habeas Counsel 801 I Street, 3d Floor Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 498-6666; FAX (916) 498-6656 Joan_Fisher@fd.org Tivon_Schardl@fd.org Attorneys for Petitioner 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 CHARLES D. RIEL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ) ______________________________________) NO. CIV S-01-0507 LKK-DAD DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE 20 21 Petitioner requests the hearing currently set for October 7, 2011, be continued. He states his 22 counsel are unavailable on that date due to previous travel and family plans. Counsel for Petitioner further 23 state that the request is unopposed and that they and counsel for the State are available on October 27. 24 Having fully considered the request, the Court finds it is supported by GOOD CAUSE and should be 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// Order Continuing Hearing Riel v. Warden, No. Civ. S 01-0507 LKK DAD 1 GRANTED. However, the court is unavailable on October 27. The October 7 hearing is continued to 2 10:00 a.m. on November 16, 2011. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 7, 2011. 5 6 7 8 9 riel pin hrg eot.or 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Continuing Hearing Riel v. Warden, No. Civ. S 01-0507 LKK DAD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?