Riel v. Woodford
Filing
501
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/07/11 granting 497 Motion for continuance of hearing. The October 7th hearing is continued to 10:00 a.m on 11/16/11. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ROBERT D. BACON, CA SB #73297
484 Lake Park Avenue, PMB 110
Oakland, California 94610
(510) 834-6219; FAX (510) 444-6861
E-mail: bacon2254@aol.com
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, CA SB #89424
Federal Defender
JOAN M. FISHER, ID SB #2854
Assistant Federal Defender
TIVON SCHARDL FL SB#0073016
Trial and Habeas Counsel
801 I Street, 3d Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 498-6666; FAX (916) 498-6656
Joan_Fisher@fd.org
Tivon_Schardl@fd.org
Attorneys for Petitioner
11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
CHARLES D. RIEL,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
)
______________________________________)
NO. CIV S-01-0507 LKK-DAD
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE
20
21
Petitioner requests the hearing currently set for October 7, 2011, be continued. He states his
22
counsel are unavailable on that date due to previous travel and family plans. Counsel for Petitioner further
23
state that the request is unopposed and that they and counsel for the State are available on October 27.
24
Having fully considered the request, the Court finds it is supported by GOOD CAUSE and should be
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
Order Continuing Hearing
Riel v. Warden, No. Civ. S 01-0507 LKK DAD
1
GRANTED. However, the court is unavailable on October 27. The October 7 hearing is continued to
2
10:00 a.m. on November 16, 2011.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 7, 2011.
5
6
7
8
9
riel pin hrg eot.or
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Continuing Hearing
Riel v. Warden, No. Civ. S 01-0507 LKK DAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?