Smithson v. Adams, et al
Filing
112
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/19/11 disregarding 111 Motion for Reconsideration. Any further documents filed by petitioner will also be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
THOMAS JOHN SMITHSON,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
14
vs.
DERRAL ADAMS, Warden, et al.,
Respondents.
ORDER
/
15
16
No. CIV S-01-1373 GEB DAD P
This petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed and judgment was entered
17
on January 14, 2008. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this court’s denial of relief in
18
a memorandum of decision issued on September 23, 2010. On November 8, 2010 the mandate
19
of the Ninth Circuit was filed. On July 6, 2011, petitioner filed a document entitled “Motion to
20
Vacate Dismissal of Habeas Petition.” Because petitioner’s July 6, 2011 motion was filed well
21
after this case was closed, the motion will be disregarded and no responsive order will be issued
22
in response thereto. Any further documents filed by petitioner will also be disregarded, and no
23
orders will issue in response to future filings.
24
DATED: August 19, 2011.
25
26
DAD:8:smithson1373.158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?