USA v. El Dorado County, et al

Filing 392

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/16/10 ORDERING that the District Third Party Action against the El Dorado County, Douglas County, City of South Lake Tahoe and South Tahoe Refuse for Declaratory Judgment and Contribution under CERCLA is DISMISSED; the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce, if necessary, the terms of the settlement agreement. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP STEVEN L. HOCH (State Bar No. 059505) GARY M. KVISTAD (State Bar No. 121869) Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP 21 East Carrillo Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Telephone: (805) 963-7000 Facsimile: (805) 965-4333 Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant/Fourth-Party Plaintiff SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. AND RELATED ACTIONS. Pursuant to the Parties' Settlement Agreement, dated December 15, 2009, and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Section 41, the following action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: the District Third Party Action against the El Dorado County, Douglas County, City of South Lake Tahoe and South Tahoe Refuse for Declaratory Judgment and Contribution under CERCLA. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce, if necessary, the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the terms of which are incorporated therein. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 16, 2010 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 10 11 21 East Carrillo Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101-2706 No. 2:01-cv-01520-MCE-GGH 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF CERTAIN THIRD PARTY CLAIMS PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?