USA v. El Dorado County, et al
Filing
459
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and MODIFICATION of partial consent decree and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/23/16. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
John C. Cruden
Assistant Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
Karl J. Fingerhood, Senior Counsel
Andrew J. Doyle, Attorney
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044
(202) 514-7519 & 514-4427
karl.fingerhood@usdoj.gov, andrew.doyle@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for United States of America
Thomas M. Bruen (SBN: 63324)
Law Offices of Thomas M. Bruen
A Professional Corporation
1990 N. California Boulevard, Suite 620
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(925) 295-3137
tbruen@tbslaw.com
Attorney for El Dorado County, California
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
19
20
21
22
23
24
No. 2:01-cv-1520-MCE-DAD
Plaintiff,
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
v.
EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
et al.,
Defendants.
AND RELATED ACTIONS.
MODIFICATION OF PARTIAL
CONSENT DECREE (ECF No. 389);
ORDER THEREON
25
26
27
28
Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon
1
1
WHEREAS in August 2010 the Court entered a Partial Consent Decree (ECF No.
2
389) between Plaintiff United States of America (“Plaintiff” or “United States”), on behalf
3
of the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (“Forest Service”), and
4
Defendant El Dorado County, California (“County” or “Settling Defendant”);
5
WHEREAS in April 2011 the County filed a Motion for Construction,
6
Enforcement, and Modification of Partial Consent Decree (“County’s Motion”);
7
WHEREAS the United States opposed that motion;
8
WHEREAS in July 2011 the Court issued a Memorandum and Order granting the
9
County’s Motion (ECF No. 416);
WHEREAS in January 2013 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
10
11
Circuit dismissed as premature the United States’ appeal of the Court’s July 2011
12
Memorandum and Order (704 F.3d 1261);
WHEREAS in October 2014 the Court order the Parties to file briefs regarding
13
14
the extent of the United States’ liability under the County’s Motion (ECF No. 445);
15
WHEREAS the Parties desire to resolve the County’s Motion, as well as certain
16
other contested matters set forth herein regarding the Partial Consent Decree, without
17
further litigation or appeal;
WHEREAS the Parties desire to enter into this Settlement Agreement and
18
19
Modification of Partial Consent Decree (“SA/MPCD”); and
20
THEREFORE, the Parties agree, and the Court orders, as follows:
21
1.
As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date1 of this
22
SA/MPCD, the United States, on behalf of the Forest Service, shall pay to the County
23
$4,100,000 to resolve any and all claims alleged by the County in conjunction with the
24
County’s Motion as well as any and all claims that the County had, has, or may have
25
arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the County’s
26
27
28
“Effective Date” shall be the date upon which this SA/MPCD is entered by the Court as
recorded on the Court docket, or, if the Court instead issues an order approving this
SA/MPCD, the date such order is recorded on the Court docket.
1
Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon
2
1
Motion.
2.
2
The United States shall make the payment required by Paragraph 1 of this
3
SA/MPCD in accordance with instructions, to be provided by the County promptly after
4
the Effective Date of this SA/MPCD.
3.
5
In the event that payment required by Paragraph 1 of this SA/MPCD is not
6
made within 45 days of the Effective Date of this SA/MPCD, Interest2 on the unpaid
7
balance shall be paid commencing on the 46th day after the Effective Date of this
8
SA/MPCD and accruing through the date of the payment.
4.
9
Paragraph 1 of this SA/MPCD also resolves any and all claims the County
10
has, had, or may have to recover any or all of Settling Defendant Excess Future OU-1
11
Construction Costs under the Partial Consent Decree.
5.
12
Within 30 days of receiving the payment required by Paragraph 1 of this
13
SA/MPCD, the County shall pay to the Forest Service $500,000 to resolve any and all
14
claims the United States, on behalf of the Forest Service, has, had, or may have to
15
recover any or all Interim Response Costs and Future Response Costs associated with
16
OU-1. Such payment by the County shall also resolve any and all claims the County
17
has, had, or may have against the United States based on any contention that the
18
Forest Service is liable for all or part of such Interim Response Costs or Future
19
Response Costs.
6.
20
The County shall make the payment required by Paragraph 5 of this
21
SA/MPCD in accordance with instructions, to be provided by the United States promptly
22
after the Effective Date of this SA/MPCD.
7.
23
24
Upon receipt of the County’s payment required by Paragraph 5 of this
SA/MPCD, the Forest Service shall deposit such amount into the Meyers Landfill
25
26
27
28
“Interest,” “Settling Defendant Excess Future OU-1 Construction Costs,” “Interim
Response Costs,” “Future Response Costs,” “Meyers Landfill Special Account,”
“Operation and Maintenance,” “Work,” and other intra-sentence capitalized words or
phrases shall have the same meaning as provided by the Partial Consent Decree
except to the extent applied to and modified by this SA/MPCD.
2
Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon
3
1
Special Account to be retained and used by the Forest Service solely to conduct or
2
finance response actions at or in connection with the Site.
3
8.
Within 30 days of receiving the payment required by Paragraph 1 of this
4
SA/MPCD, the County shall establish and fund an interest-bearing trust in the amount of
5
$2,700,000 to be used for OU-1 Operation and Maintenance (“O&M”). The County shall
6
establish and fund such trust in accordance with instructions, to be provided by the
7
United States promptly after the Effective Date of this SA/MPCD. Any fees required to
8
establish or maintain the trust shall be subtracted from the $2,700,000 funding.
9
9.
The County shall not seek to recover from the United States any of the
10
funds required to establish the trust required by Paragraph 8 of this SA/MPCD.
11
Likewise, after the completion of such funding by the County, the United States shall not
12
seek to recover from the County any additional funds for OU-1 O&M, including any fees
13
of any sort for the establishment and maintenance of the trust.
14
10.
Upon the earlier of the (1) County’s (a) payment of the $500,000 required
15
by Paragraph 5 of this SA/MPCD and (b) establishment and funding of the trust required
16
by Paragraph 8; or (2) 75 days after the Effective Date, the County shall be relieved of
17
any and all Work or payment obligations under the Partial Consent Decree associated
18
with OU-1, including but not limited to: conducting additional Work associated with OU-
19
1; obtaining an OU-1 Certificate of Completion from the Forest Service; paying Future
20
Response Costs associated with OU-1, conducting OU-1 O&M, and paying Past,
21
Interim, or Future Oversight Costs associated with OU-1 O&M (the "OU-1 Release"). If
22
the OU-1 Release takes effect because of clause (2) in the preceding sentence, and the
23
County fails to timely make the $500,000 payment required by Paragraph 5 or fails to
24
timely establish and fund the trust required by Paragraph 8, the OU-1 Release shall be
25
suspended and rendered ineffective as of the first day of such noncompliance, and the
26
period of suspension and ineffectiveness shall continue until the County cures any such
27
noncompliance (at which time the suspension shall lift and the OU-1 Release shall
28
again be effective).
Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon
4
1
2
3
11.
Paragraphs 18, 91, and 95 of the Partial Consent Decree in their entirety
are vacated. Subparagraphs (a) and (i) of Paragraph 94 are also vacated.
12.
Paragraph 92 of the Partial Consent Decree is modified as follows:
4
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Partial Consent Decree or this SA/MPCD,
5
the United States reserves, and the Partial Consent Decree and SA/MPCD are without
6
prejudice to, the right to institute a new action or to issue an administrative order,
7
seeking to compel the County to perform further response actions at OU-1 and/or to pay
8
the United States for additional costs of response at OU-1 if, (a) subsequent to
9
December 31, 2013, (i) conditions at the Site, previously unknown to the Forest Service,
10
are discovered, or (ii) information, previously unknown to the Forest Service, is
11
received, in whole or in part, and (b) the Forest Service determines that these
12
previously unknown conditions or this information together with other relevant
13
information indicate that the Remedial Action is not protective of human health or the
14
environment. As of the date the United States executes this SA/MPCD, the Forest
15
Service represents that it has no such knowledge as to (a) and (b) in the preceding
16
sentence.
17
13.
Paragraph 93 of the Partial Consent Decree is modified as follows: For
18
purposes of Paragraph 92, the information and conditions known to the Forest Service
19
shall include only that information and those conditions known to the Forest Service as
20
of December 31, 2013 and set forth in the OU-1 ROD Decision, the administrative
21
record supporting the OU-1 ROD, the post-OU-1 ROD administrative record, or in any
22
information received by the Forest Service pursuant to the requirements of the Partial
23
Consent Decree prior to December 31, 2013.
24
14.
With respect to Paragraph 67 of the Partial Consent Decree, the phrase
25
“December 31, 2015” shall be substituted for the phrase “the first anniversary of the
26
Forest Service’s Certification of Completion of the Remedial Action for OU-1 pursuant to
27
Subparagraph 49.b. of Section XIV (Certification of Completion).” With respect to
28
Paragraph 112 of the Partial Consent Decree, the phrase “December 31, 2024” for the
Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon
5
1
phrase “ten years after Settling Defendant’s receipt of the Service’s notification pursuant
2
to Paragraph 49.b of Section XIV (Certification of Completion of the Remedial Action).”
3
15.
The Partial Consent Decree (ECF No. 389) is incorporated by reference
4
herein (including, for example, Section IV’s definitions -- as reflected in footnote 2 of this
5
SA/MPCD), except as modified by this SA/MPCD or rendered irrelevant by events
6
occurring subsequent to the Effective Date of the Partial Consent Decree.
7
16.
Upon the United States’ payment pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this
8
SA/MPCD, the Court’s Memorandum and Order of July 2011 (ECF No. 416) and all
9
related Orders are vacated and superseded by this SA/MPCD.
10
FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
11
12
JOHN C. CRUDEN
Assistant Attorney General
Environment and Natural Resources
Division
United States Department of Justice
13
14
15
16
17
8/10/2016
____________/s/_____________________
KARL J. FINGERHOOD
Senior Counsel
Environmental Enforcement Section
Environment and Natural Resources
Division
United States Department of Justice
8/10/2016
__________/s/_______________________
ANDREW J. DOYLE
Trial Attorney
Environmental Defense Section
Environment and Natural Resources
Division
United States Department of Justice
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon
6
1
FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE:
2
3
6/07/2016
4
5
6
7
____________/s/______________________
RANDY MOORE
Regional Forester
United States Department of Agriculture
Forest Service
1323 Club Drive
Vallejo, California 94592
8
9
10
FOR THE COUNTY OF EL DORADO, CALIFORNIA:
Date: 3/08/2016
Signature: __________/s/____________________
11
Name (Print): Ron Mikulaco
12
Title: Chair, Board of Supervisors
13
Address: 330 Fair Lane
Placerville, CA 95667
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated: September 23, 2016
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?