USA v. El Dorado County, et al

Filing 459

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and MODIFICATION of partial consent decree and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/23/16. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 John C. Cruden Assistant Attorney General United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Karl J. Fingerhood, Senior Counsel Andrew J. Doyle, Attorney P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 (202) 514-7519 & 514-4427 karl.fingerhood@usdoj.gov, andrew.doyle@usdoj.gov Attorneys for United States of America Thomas M. Bruen (SBN: 63324) Law Offices of Thomas M. Bruen A Professional Corporation 1990 N. California Boulevard, Suite 620 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (925) 295-3137 tbruen@tbslaw.com Attorney for El Dorado County, California 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 19 20 21 22 23 24 No. 2:01-cv-1520-MCE-DAD Plaintiff, SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND v. EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. AND RELATED ACTIONS. MODIFICATION OF PARTIAL CONSENT DECREE (ECF No. 389); ORDER THEREON 25 26 27 28 Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon 1 1 WHEREAS in August 2010 the Court entered a Partial Consent Decree (ECF No. 2 389) between Plaintiff United States of America (“Plaintiff” or “United States”), on behalf 3 of the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (“Forest Service”), and 4 Defendant El Dorado County, California (“County” or “Settling Defendant”); 5 WHEREAS in April 2011 the County filed a Motion for Construction, 6 Enforcement, and Modification of Partial Consent Decree (“County’s Motion”); 7 WHEREAS the United States opposed that motion; 8 WHEREAS in July 2011 the Court issued a Memorandum and Order granting the 9 County’s Motion (ECF No. 416); WHEREAS in January 2013 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth 10 11 Circuit dismissed as premature the United States’ appeal of the Court’s July 2011 12 Memorandum and Order (704 F.3d 1261); WHEREAS in October 2014 the Court order the Parties to file briefs regarding 13 14 the extent of the United States’ liability under the County’s Motion (ECF No. 445); 15 WHEREAS the Parties desire to resolve the County’s Motion, as well as certain 16 other contested matters set forth herein regarding the Partial Consent Decree, without 17 further litigation or appeal; WHEREAS the Parties desire to enter into this Settlement Agreement and 18 19 Modification of Partial Consent Decree (“SA/MPCD”); and 20 THEREFORE, the Parties agree, and the Court orders, as follows: 21 1. As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date1 of this 22 SA/MPCD, the United States, on behalf of the Forest Service, shall pay to the County 23 $4,100,000 to resolve any and all claims alleged by the County in conjunction with the 24 County’s Motion as well as any and all claims that the County had, has, or may have 25 arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the County’s 26 27 28 “Effective Date” shall be the date upon which this SA/MPCD is entered by the Court as recorded on the Court docket, or, if the Court instead issues an order approving this SA/MPCD, the date such order is recorded on the Court docket. 1 Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon 2 1 Motion. 2. 2 The United States shall make the payment required by Paragraph 1 of this 3 SA/MPCD in accordance with instructions, to be provided by the County promptly after 4 the Effective Date of this SA/MPCD. 3. 5 In the event that payment required by Paragraph 1 of this SA/MPCD is not 6 made within 45 days of the Effective Date of this SA/MPCD, Interest2 on the unpaid 7 balance shall be paid commencing on the 46th day after the Effective Date of this 8 SA/MPCD and accruing through the date of the payment. 4. 9 Paragraph 1 of this SA/MPCD also resolves any and all claims the County 10 has, had, or may have to recover any or all of Settling Defendant Excess Future OU-1 11 Construction Costs under the Partial Consent Decree. 5. 12 Within 30 days of receiving the payment required by Paragraph 1 of this 13 SA/MPCD, the County shall pay to the Forest Service $500,000 to resolve any and all 14 claims the United States, on behalf of the Forest Service, has, had, or may have to 15 recover any or all Interim Response Costs and Future Response Costs associated with 16 OU-1. Such payment by the County shall also resolve any and all claims the County 17 has, had, or may have against the United States based on any contention that the 18 Forest Service is liable for all or part of such Interim Response Costs or Future 19 Response Costs. 6. 20 The County shall make the payment required by Paragraph 5 of this 21 SA/MPCD in accordance with instructions, to be provided by the United States promptly 22 after the Effective Date of this SA/MPCD. 7. 23 24 Upon receipt of the County’s payment required by Paragraph 5 of this SA/MPCD, the Forest Service shall deposit such amount into the Meyers Landfill 25 26 27 28 “Interest,” “Settling Defendant Excess Future OU-1 Construction Costs,” “Interim Response Costs,” “Future Response Costs,” “Meyers Landfill Special Account,” “Operation and Maintenance,” “Work,” and other intra-sentence capitalized words or phrases shall have the same meaning as provided by the Partial Consent Decree except to the extent applied to and modified by this SA/MPCD. 2 Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon 3 1 Special Account to be retained and used by the Forest Service solely to conduct or 2 finance response actions at or in connection with the Site. 3 8. Within 30 days of receiving the payment required by Paragraph 1 of this 4 SA/MPCD, the County shall establish and fund an interest-bearing trust in the amount of 5 $2,700,000 to be used for OU-1 Operation and Maintenance (“O&M”). The County shall 6 establish and fund such trust in accordance with instructions, to be provided by the 7 United States promptly after the Effective Date of this SA/MPCD. Any fees required to 8 establish or maintain the trust shall be subtracted from the $2,700,000 funding. 9 9. The County shall not seek to recover from the United States any of the 10 funds required to establish the trust required by Paragraph 8 of this SA/MPCD. 11 Likewise, after the completion of such funding by the County, the United States shall not 12 seek to recover from the County any additional funds for OU-1 O&M, including any fees 13 of any sort for the establishment and maintenance of the trust. 14 10. Upon the earlier of the (1) County’s (a) payment of the $500,000 required 15 by Paragraph 5 of this SA/MPCD and (b) establishment and funding of the trust required 16 by Paragraph 8; or (2) 75 days after the Effective Date, the County shall be relieved of 17 any and all Work or payment obligations under the Partial Consent Decree associated 18 with OU-1, including but not limited to: conducting additional Work associated with OU- 19 1; obtaining an OU-1 Certificate of Completion from the Forest Service; paying Future 20 Response Costs associated with OU-1, conducting OU-1 O&M, and paying Past, 21 Interim, or Future Oversight Costs associated with OU-1 O&M (the "OU-1 Release"). If 22 the OU-1 Release takes effect because of clause (2) in the preceding sentence, and the 23 County fails to timely make the $500,000 payment required by Paragraph 5 or fails to 24 timely establish and fund the trust required by Paragraph 8, the OU-1 Release shall be 25 suspended and rendered ineffective as of the first day of such noncompliance, and the 26 period of suspension and ineffectiveness shall continue until the County cures any such 27 noncompliance (at which time the suspension shall lift and the OU-1 Release shall 28 again be effective). Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon 4 1 2 3 11. Paragraphs 18, 91, and 95 of the Partial Consent Decree in their entirety are vacated. Subparagraphs (a) and (i) of Paragraph 94 are also vacated. 12. Paragraph 92 of the Partial Consent Decree is modified as follows: 4 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Partial Consent Decree or this SA/MPCD, 5 the United States reserves, and the Partial Consent Decree and SA/MPCD are without 6 prejudice to, the right to institute a new action or to issue an administrative order, 7 seeking to compel the County to perform further response actions at OU-1 and/or to pay 8 the United States for additional costs of response at OU-1 if, (a) subsequent to 9 December 31, 2013, (i) conditions at the Site, previously unknown to the Forest Service, 10 are discovered, or (ii) information, previously unknown to the Forest Service, is 11 received, in whole or in part, and (b) the Forest Service determines that these 12 previously unknown conditions or this information together with other relevant 13 information indicate that the Remedial Action is not protective of human health or the 14 environment. As of the date the United States executes this SA/MPCD, the Forest 15 Service represents that it has no such knowledge as to (a) and (b) in the preceding 16 sentence. 17 13. Paragraph 93 of the Partial Consent Decree is modified as follows: For 18 purposes of Paragraph 92, the information and conditions known to the Forest Service 19 shall include only that information and those conditions known to the Forest Service as 20 of December 31, 2013 and set forth in the OU-1 ROD Decision, the administrative 21 record supporting the OU-1 ROD, the post-OU-1 ROD administrative record, or in any 22 information received by the Forest Service pursuant to the requirements of the Partial 23 Consent Decree prior to December 31, 2013. 24 14. With respect to Paragraph 67 of the Partial Consent Decree, the phrase 25 “December 31, 2015” shall be substituted for the phrase “the first anniversary of the 26 Forest Service’s Certification of Completion of the Remedial Action for OU-1 pursuant to 27 Subparagraph 49.b. of Section XIV (Certification of Completion).” With respect to 28 Paragraph 112 of the Partial Consent Decree, the phrase “December 31, 2024” for the Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon 5 1 phrase “ten years after Settling Defendant’s receipt of the Service’s notification pursuant 2 to Paragraph 49.b of Section XIV (Certification of Completion of the Remedial Action).” 3 15. The Partial Consent Decree (ECF No. 389) is incorporated by reference 4 herein (including, for example, Section IV’s definitions -- as reflected in footnote 2 of this 5 SA/MPCD), except as modified by this SA/MPCD or rendered irrelevant by events 6 occurring subsequent to the Effective Date of the Partial Consent Decree. 7 16. Upon the United States’ payment pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this 8 SA/MPCD, the Court’s Memorandum and Order of July 2011 (ECF No. 416) and all 9 related Orders are vacated and superseded by this SA/MPCD. 10 FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 11 12 JOHN C. CRUDEN Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice 13 14 15 16 17 8/10/2016 ____________/s/_____________________ KARL J. FINGERHOOD Senior Counsel Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice 8/10/2016 __________/s/_______________________ ANDREW J. DOYLE Trial Attorney Environmental Defense Section Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon 6 1 FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE: 2 3 6/07/2016 4 5 6 7 ____________/s/______________________ RANDY MOORE Regional Forester United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service 1323 Club Drive Vallejo, California 94592 8 9 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF EL DORADO, CALIFORNIA: Date: 3/08/2016 Signature: __________/s/____________________ 11 Name (Print): Ron Mikulaco 12 Title: Chair, Board of Supervisors 13 Address: 330 Fair Lane Placerville, CA 95667 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: September 23, 2016 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Settlement Agreement & Modification of PCD; Order Thereon 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?