Chappell v. Bess, et al
Filing
117
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 02/17/09 GRANTING 115 Substitution of Attorney. Attorney Laurence L. Angelo for Quist added. (Streeter, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LAURENCE L. ANGELO, ESQ., SB No. 034528 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF Attorneys at Law 601 University Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 564-6100
Telecopier: (916) 564-6263
Attorneys for Defendant M.D. QUIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No.: 2:01-cv-01979-FCD-KJM ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ) COUNSEL ) vs. ) ) SAMUEL BESS, M.D. QUIST, et al., ) ) Defendants. ______________________________________ ) REX CHAPPELL, TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant M.D. QUIST substitutes as his counsel the law firm of Angelo Kilday & Kilduff, 601 University Avenue, STE 150, Sacramento, CA 95825, (916) 564-6100, for the law offices of Moreno and Rivera, LLP, 1451 River Park Drive, STE 145, Sacramento, CA 95815, (916) 922-1200. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Michael Quist, sued herein as "M.D. Quist", consents to said substitution. Dated: December 11, 2008. /s/Michael D. Quist _____________________________________ MICHAEL QUIST
-1ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
We accept said substitution of counsel. Dated: September 11, 2008. MORENO & RIVERA, LLP /s/Jonathan B. Paul By:_________________________________ JONATHAN B. PAUL. ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant MICHAEL QUIST We accept said substitution of counsel. Dated: December 4, 2008. ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF /s/Laurence L. Angelo By:_________________________________ LAURENCE L. ANGELO, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant, MICHAEL QUIST
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 17, 2009
_______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?