Chappell v. Bess, et al

Filing 191

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/15/11 ORDERING that the parties are DIRECTED to file, w/i 30 days, separate status reports setting forth the status of discovery in this action, and the reasonableness of the current deadlines for completing discovery and filing dispositive motions. Any request for an extension of time shall be supported by an explanation why the current deadline is impracticable, and why an alternative date, specifically proposed, is both warranted and re asonable. In addition, each party shall indicate whether there is any reasonable possibility to achieve a settlement in this action and, if so, whether each party consents to the undersigned presiding over an early settlement conference. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REX CHAPPELL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 SAM BESS, et al., 14 Defendants. ______________________________/ No. 2:01-cv-01979 KJN P ORDER 15 16 On May 16, 2011, this court appointed attorney Scott Handleman to represent 17 plaintiff in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). Former co-counsel Joel Liberson and 18 Philip Allingham were directed to cooperate with Mr. Handleman by facilitating the transmission 19 of all records and information, written and oral, essential to represent plaintiff’s best interests in 20 this ten-year-old case. The deadline for filing dispositive motions in this action remains October 21 30, 2011, premised on the assumption that the continued discovery deadlines1 remain reasonable 22 despite the change in plaintiff’s representation. (Dkt. No. 162.) 23 //// 24 //// 25 1 26 Nonexpert discovery closed on February 17, 2011; close of expert discovery is set for August 29, 2011. (Dkt. No. 162 at 4.) 1 In order to assess the current status of this case, the parties2 are directed to file, 1 2 within thirty days after the filing date of this order, separate status reports setting forth the status 3 of discovery in this action, and the reasonableness of the current deadlines for completing 4 discovery and filing dispositive motions. Any request for an extension of time shall be supported 5 by an explanation why the current deadline is impracticable, and why an alternative date, 6 specifically proposed, is both warranted and reasonable. In addition, each party shall indicate 7 whether there is any reasonable possibility to achieve a settlement in this action and, if so, 8 whether each party consents to the undersigned presiding over an early settlement conference. 9 10 SO ORDERED. DATED: June 15, 2011 11 12 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 chap1979.stat 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 26 Each of the three parties (plaintiff and two defendants) is represented by separate counsel. Accordingly, three separate status reports shall be filed. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?