Chappell v. Bess, et al
Filing
191
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/15/11 ORDERING that the parties are DIRECTED to file, w/i 30 days, separate status reports setting forth the status of discovery in this action, and the reasonableness of the current deadlines for completing discovery and filing dispositive motions. Any request for an extension of time shall be supported by an explanation why the current deadline is impracticable, and why an alternative date, specifically proposed, is both warranted and re asonable. In addition, each party shall indicate whether there is any reasonable possibility to achieve a settlement in this action and, if so, whether each party consents to the undersigned presiding over an early settlement conference. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
REX CHAPPELL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
SAM BESS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
______________________________/
No. 2:01-cv-01979 KJN P
ORDER
15
16
On May 16, 2011, this court appointed attorney Scott Handleman to represent
17
plaintiff in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). Former co-counsel Joel Liberson and
18
Philip Allingham were directed to cooperate with Mr. Handleman by facilitating the transmission
19
of all records and information, written and oral, essential to represent plaintiff’s best interests in
20
this ten-year-old case. The deadline for filing dispositive motions in this action remains October
21
30, 2011, premised on the assumption that the continued discovery deadlines1 remain reasonable
22
despite the change in plaintiff’s representation. (Dkt. No. 162.)
23
////
24
////
25
1
26
Nonexpert discovery closed on February 17, 2011; close of expert discovery is set for
August 29, 2011. (Dkt. No. 162 at 4.)
1
In order to assess the current status of this case, the parties2 are directed to file,
1
2
within thirty days after the filing date of this order, separate status reports setting forth the status
3
of discovery in this action, and the reasonableness of the current deadlines for completing
4
discovery and filing dispositive motions. Any request for an extension of time shall be supported
5
by an explanation why the current deadline is impracticable, and why an alternative date,
6
specifically proposed, is both warranted and reasonable. In addition, each party shall indicate
7
whether there is any reasonable possibility to achieve a settlement in this action and, if so,
8
whether each party consents to the undersigned presiding over an early settlement conference.
9
10
SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 15, 2011
11
12
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
chap1979.stat
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
26
Each of the three parties (plaintiff and two defendants) is represented by separate
counsel. Accordingly, three separate status reports shall be filed.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?