Chappell v. Bess, et al
Filing
196
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/19/11 ORDERING that No adjustments are required in the Discovery deadlines. Nonexpert Discovery closed on 2/17/11; Close of Expert Discovery shall remain 8/29/11. The deadline for hearing Dispositive Motions shall remain 10/30/2011. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
REX CHAPPELL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. 2:01-cv-01979 KJN P
SAM BESS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
16
All parties have filed status reports responsive to this court’s order filed June 16,
17
2011, following the court’s appointment of new counsel to represent plaintiff. Pursuant to the
18
court’s review of each report, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
19
20
1. No adjustments are required in the discovery deadlines. Nonexpert discovery
closed on February 17, 2011; close of expert discovery shall remain August 29, 2011.
21
2. The deadline for hearing dispositive motions shall remain October 30, 2011.
22
3. Subsequent to each defendant filing their respective status report, plaintiff filed
23
his status report wherein he offered to settle this action for $5000 from each defendant. Although
24
each defendant previously stated their unwillingness to settle this action, counsel for the parties
25
may wish to further pursue the matter. Should counsel for any defendant, together with
26
plaintiff’s counsel, determine that a settlement conference may be helpful, they should so inform
1
1
the court to request a date, and indicate whether the parties consent to the undersigned presiding
2
over the settlement conference.
3
SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: August 19, 2011
5
6
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
chap1979.8.15.11.stat
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?