Lewis v. Woodford
Filing
197
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/15/2019 ORDERING, within 30 days, counsel for petitioner shall submit the proposed budgeting documentation under seal and in compliance with the procedures detailed in the "Appendix" section attached to this order. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order upon Kurt Heiser, CJA Administrator, Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California. (cc: Kurt Heiser) (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MILTON OTIS LEWIS,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:02-cv-0013-TLN-EFB
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER
RONALD DAVIS, Warden, San Quentin
State Prison,
Respondent.
16
17
18
Counsel for petitioner have indicated that they are prepared to submit proposed budgeting
19
documentation in this case. Those documents should be filed within thirty days from the date this
20
order is served, under seal, and in compliance with the procedures detailed below in the
21
“Appendix” section. If counsel requires additional time, they may submit a request which
22
indicates the length of their desired extension and the reasons necessitating it. After receipt of
23
the budgeting documents, the court will apprise counsel as to whether and when it will hold a
24
conference to discuss budgeting procedures.
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
In addition to serving this order upon petitioner’s counsel, the Clerk of Court is directed to
2
serve it upon Kurt Heiser, CJA Administrator, Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern
3
District of California.
4
DATED: July 15, 2019.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
APPENDIX
2
Counsel appointed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599 and Local Rule 191 to represent a condemned
3
prisoner seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 will be required to propose budgets for their time
4
and expenses anticipated during each phase of the proceedings. Set out below are the procedures
5
for proposing budgets and submitting vouchers for reimbursement.
6
BUDGET PROCEDURES
Under 18 U.S.C. ' 3599(f), ex parte consideration of funding applications requires
7
1.
8
petitioner to make a showing of the need for confidentiality. Since budget applications require
9
disclosure of matters protected by the attorney-client or work-product privileges, the need for
10
confidentiality is inherent in the budgeting process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1) and (3).
11
Accordingly, budget forms and supporting documentation will be filed under seal and not served
12
on counsel for respondent. Counsel shall submit budget-related filings by e-mailing them to the
13
court’s AApproved Sealed@ e-mail address, ApprovedSealed@caed.uscourts.gov. The provisions
14
of Local Rule 141 regarding the process for filing documents under seal are suspended with
15
respect to budgeting in capital habeas cases. Any ex parte court proceeding regarding funding
16
will be reported and maintained under seal.
17
2.
18
budget preparation, as well as the time for paralegals, investigators and experts, if applicable, and
19
any anticipated travel or other expenses. Voucher preparation, however, is considered part of
20
overhead and not reimbursable. In preparing a budget, counsel shall refer to the Ninth Circuit
21
Judicial Council=s costs policies for capital habeas cases. Current cost policies are available on
22
this court’s website at www.caed.uscourts.gov, under Forms, CJA Capital Habeas Forms.
23
3.
24
declaration(s) which explain and/or justify the hours, tasks, and expenses sought. Counsel shall
25
include any information that will assist the court in determining the reasonableness of the budget
26
request. If petitioner is represented by two attorneys, counsel shall explain how the work will be
27
divided between them. The supporting documentation should be captioned and filed under seal in
28
a complete application, including explanatory remarks, declarations, and exhibits. All supporting
A proposed budget should reflect the total attorney time required, including time for
In support of the proposed budget for each phase, counsel shall file informative
3
1
declarations must be properly subscribed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1746.
2
4.
3
responsibilities to lower-rate personnel whenever practical, and to utilize paralegals and law
4
clerks to complete tasks for which attorney expertise is not required.
5
5.
6
present the factual basis to support the request. Prior to approval, the court must find that the
7
requested expert or investigative assistance is Areasonably necessary for the representation of the
8
defendant.@ 18 U.S.C. ' 3599(f). Information which should be included in the supporting
9
declaration to assist the court includes, but is not limited to, a specification of: (1) the evidence
Counsel are expected to utilize all reasonable means to minimize costs, to tier staff
Requests in the budget for investigative and/or expert assistance should be detailed and
10
sought to be uncovered; (2) facts suggesting that such investigation, expert service, or other
11
assistance is warranted; (3) whether the evidence existed at the time of the state trial; (4) whether
12
similar assistance was provided or requested in state court; (5) the purpose of the evidence on
13
federal habeas, that is, the connection of the evidence sought to be uncovered to a prospective
14
claim or contention that will be raised in the federal petition; (6) the name of the expert or
15
investigator; and (7) the proposed billing rate and the reasonableness of the rate. Presumptive
16
rates contained in the Ninth Circuit Capital Habeas Costs Policy will apply to all experts,
17
investigators, and paralegals.
18
6.
19
expenses. In addition, each expert and investigator=s time will be a separate budget figure.
20
Counsel generally will not be allowed to exceed the authorized budget during any phase without
21
first seeking prior approval, or amendment to the budget, and explaining why additional
22
funds are required. Failing to obtain approval to amend the budget could result in the denial of
23
unauthorized or excessive expenditures.
24
7.
25
Hours and expenditures will not be carried over to the next phase. Rather, a new budget for each
26
succeeding phase must be proposed by counsel and approved by the court. As the case progresses
27
through each case management phase, counsel are responsible for ensuring that the case is
28
litigated within the established budget.
The approved budget for each phase will be one sum for attorney time and one sum for
The budget for each phase will be closed out when the work for that phase is completed.
4
1
8.
2
of the Ninth Circuit. Counsel are authorized to proceed based upon the initial budget approved by
3
the district court and will be contacted should any further clarification, information, or action be
4
requested by the Judicial Council.
Any budget approved by the district court must also be approved by the Judicial Council
5
APPROVED COMPENSATION
6
1.
7
law, which is not directly attributable to a particular case, including the review and analysis of
8
new cases, is considered general overhead, and is not reimbursable.
9
2.
Work inherently necessary to practice and remain current in the area of federal habeas
The court will not approve compensation for administrative services, such as secretarial
10
services, preparation of payment vouchers, or communications with court staff.
11
3.
12
physical attendance at court hearings. Upon sufficient justification, the court may authorize
13
compensation for up to two members of counsel=s legal staff at a time for visits to petitioner and
14
witness interviews. Counsel who reside outside the Sacramento area will typically make court
15
appearances by telephone unless they have requested, and been approved, for travel to
16
Sacramento.
17
4.
18
(whether from interlocutory orders or final judgments). Counsel shall seek compensation for
19
work performed at the appellate level from the Court of Appeals after having obtained an
20
appointment from that court.
21
5.
22
carrier) terminals and as a passenger on common carriers only when counsel is performing
23
substantive tasks on the case that can be billed to a professional time category. Terminal
24
processing time as well as driving time will be compensated at the maximum rate of $100 per
25
hour. In light of the public service nature of CJA appointments together with the fact
26
that public rather than private funds are being utilized, the travel reimbursement set forth in this
27
paragraph will be applied.
Unless a contrary need is demonstrated, the court will compensate only one attorney for
The court will not approve compensation for work performed on appellate proceedings
The court will compensate counsel for professional time spent in airport (or other common
28
5
1
APPROVED EXPENSES
2
1.
3
subject to national and district policies and procedures. Copies of all bills and receipts must be
4
submitted for reimbursement approval.
5
2.
6
claimed at the rate in effect for federal judicial employees, available from the CJA Administrator.
7
Case-related parking fees and bridge/road tolls also are reimbursable. Counsel should assess
8
whether case-related travel would be more cost effective by privately owned automobile or rented
9
automobile.
The court will authorize payment for miscellaneous expenses reasonably incurred and
Mileage for case-related travel by privately owned (not rented) automobile may be
10
3.
11
actual expense basis. Counsel should make every effort to obtain the lowest possible fares or
12
rates.
13
4.
14
petitioner=s litigation team intends to travel by air, a Travel Request and Authorization Form must
15
be authorized by the CJA Administrator and approved by the court, unless counsel can procure
16
more economical travel arrangements on his or her own. Approval of a travel authorization form
17
is the procedure by which government rates for travel are obtained; the form does not function as
18
approval of travel expenses in excess of the budget. Should the authorized budget be insufficient
19
for the anticipated costs of travel, counsel must seek modification of the budget from the court in
20
addition to obtaining a travel authorization form from the CJA Administrator.
21
5.
22
government rates paid directly from CJA funds. Counsel are expected to request authorization for
23
air travel through the CJA Administrator in sufficient time to obtain low cost advance fare for air
24
travel or to provide justification why an advance fare could not be obtained. In no case will
25
counsel be reimbursed for first-class travel expenses. Counsel may make their own reservations
26
for air travel and seek reimbursement on a CJA voucher, but reimbursement will be limited to the
27
available government rates.
28
6.
Ground transportation other than by privately owned automobile will be reimbursed on an
Though travel expenses may be authorized in the budget, each time a member of
The Travel Request and Authorization Form enables CJA counsel to receive air travel at
The court will approve reimbursement for actual food and lodging expenses for out of
6
1
town travel on case-related business, subject to the maximum established area per diem rate.
2
Current travel and subsistence allowances are available on the GSA website, www.gsa.gov, under
3
Per Diem rates, or from the CJA Administrator.
4
7.
5
calls. The court will not authorize payment for any surcharges or for general telephone service.
6
Facsimile transmissions are reimbursable for the actual amount of the telephone charge.
7
8.
8
photocopying, up to a maximum of 10 cents per page. Counsel will be expected to send
9
documents over 100 pages in length to an outside copying service, unless counsel=s in-house
Counsel will be reimbursed for the actual cost of case-related long-distance telephone
Counsel will be reimbursed for the actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
10
photocopying is more economically efficient.
11
9.
12
postage. The court will approve reimbursement for the actual cost of other postal services or the
13
use of non-federal carriers (such as overnight or two-day delivery) only if circumstances require
14
the use of such services. If counsel utilize expedited delivery services, a statement detailing the
15
necessity of such delivery must be submitted with the itemized bill. Counsel are to make every
16
effort to use regular U.S. mail and e-mail via the Internet whenever possible. The court may
17
modify this rule if counsel make excessive use of costly overnight carriers.
18
10.
The court will authorize reimbursement for the actual cost of case-related regular U.S.
The court will not reimburse counsel for the following expenditures:
19
a. General office overhead; including cellular telephone maintenance fees;
20
b. Books or other publications;
21
c. Flat-fee computer research plans
22
d. General law office supplies and equipment;
23
e. Travel, attendance, registration, or material costs related to educational seminars.
24
VOUCHER PROCEDURES
25
1.
26
Kurt Heiser. Questions regarding the e-voucher system should be directed to Mr. Heiser at (916)
27
498-5700 or kurt_heiser@fd.org.
28
2.
All payment vouchers shall be submitted in the e-voucher format to CJA Administrator
All vouchers are reviewed for reasonableness. In addition, fees or expenses which exceed
7
1
the authorized budget or the limits set forth herein are subject to reduction without further notice
2
or explanation.
3
3.
4
completion of each budgeted phase, on a monthly basis. Generally, vouchers should extend from
5
the first to the last day of each month, except when combined attorney=s fees and expenses total
6
less than $1,000 for any given month. In that event, the fees and expenses for that month may be
7
combined with the fees and expenses incurred the following month. If a budgeted phase
8
commences mid-month, the voucher may extend to the end of the following month. Similarly, if
9
the budgeted phase is completed mid-month, the voucher will extend to that date. All vouchers
Counsel shall submit vouchers covering services from the commencement to the
10
are to be submitted within the first ten days of the month following the last day of service
11
reported. All fees and expenses for a particular time period should be submitted on the same
12
voucher to the extent possible (e.g., travel and administrative expenses).
13
4.
14
absent prior arrangements made with the court for a later submission. Without prior court
15
approval, vouchers will not be processed for services rendered more than one-year prior to the
16
date of submission of the voucher.
17
5.
18
each specific task, reported to one-tenth (.1) of an hour. Descriptions should not be vague or
19
general. Each time entry shall reflect discrete, individual tasks and shall not simply list multiple
20
tasks performed in a specified block of time. Information should be provided in sufficient detail
21
so as to permit meaningful review, including: identification of individual witnesses interviewed;
22
identification, by name or title, of persons involved in telephone conversations or conferences;
23
specific topics researched; and identification of pleadings drafted or reviewed.
24
6.
25
petitioner, petitioner=s counsel should arrange with the court reporter(s) to bill the court directly
26
through the use of a CJA Form 24. Counsel shall not include the cost of transcripts as an
27
out-of-pocket expense on a CJA Form 30.
28
7.
The court expects counsel to submit vouchers within 90 days of the services provided,
Voucher timesheets shall specifically describe the work performed, the time allotted to
In the event that in-court transcripts of non-evidentiary hearings are requested by
Services provided by counsel=s non-attorney employees may be listed as an expense on
8
1
counsel=s CJA Form 30. Independent contractor paralegal services, like investigator and expert
2
services, should be billed on a CJA Form 31. Petitioner=s counsel shall adhere to these
3
procedures and policies for the preparation of budgets for each phase of these proceedings and for
4
the preparation and submission of all payment vouchers.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?