Mejia v. City of Sacramento, et al

Filing 86

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 9/5/06 ORDERING parties to file a joint status report no later than 10/2/06 in which they propose a trial date for the remanded issues and discuss whether the district court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims that were dismissed without prejudice by the Order filed 4/5/04. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
Mejia v. City of Sacramento, et al Doc. 86 Case 2:02-cv-01174-GEB-EFB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RICK J. MEJIA, 10 Document 86 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:02-cv-1174-GEB-EFB ORDER Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties shall file a joint status report no later than October 2, 2006, in which they propose a trial date for the remanded issues and discuss whether the district court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims that were dismissed ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:02-cv-01174-GEB-EFB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: Document 86 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 2 of 2 without prejudice by the Order filed April 5, 2004.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. September 5, 2006 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in the preparation of the joint status report does not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file a status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely submitting the status report shall include a declaration explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of the other party or parties. 2 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?